Literature DB >> 11773182

Salvage chemotherapy for patients with advanced pure seminoma.

Jacqueline Vuky1, Satish K Tickoo, Joel Sheinfeld, Jennifer Bacik, Alison Amsterdam, Madhu Mazumdar, Victor Reuter, Dean F Bajorin, George J Bosl, Robert J Motzer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe the response to conventional or high-dose salvage chemotherapy in patients with advanced seminoma who experience disease progression after receiving first-line platinum-based treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with progressive, advanced, pure seminoma were treated with salvage chemotherapy. Fifteen patients were treated with conventional-dose cisplatin-and-ifosfamide combination chemotherapy. Twelve patients were treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell rescue.
RESULTS: Fifteen patients (56%) achieved a complete response (CR), nine achieved CR with a conventional-dose cisplatin and ifosfamide program, and six experienced CR after high-dose chemotherapy. Fourteen patients (52%) are alive and disease-free, with 13 (48%) continuously disease-free at a median follow-up of 72 months. Twelve (57%) of 21 patients whose pretreatment tumors were studied morphologically were found to have seminoma with atypia. Eight patients underwent resection after salvage chemotherapy; six with histologic findings of necrotic debris/fibrosis alone are alive and disease-free at last follow-up. Both patients with viable seminoma found at surgery died of disease.
CONCLUSION: Most patients with advanced seminoma are cured with standard first-line programs of cisplatin and etoposide with or without bleomycin. A small minority of patients with pure seminoma have resistant tumors and require salvage chemotherapy. In this setting, approximately 50% of patients with recurrent pure seminoma achieve durable CR with conventional or high-dose salvage chemotherapy. Identification of biologic markers to predict clinical outcome and an enhanced understanding of the basic biologic features of seminoma may lead to improvements in the management of this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11773182     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.1.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current Management of Refractory Germ Cell Tumors and Future Directions.

Authors:  J Clayton Allen; Austin Kirschner; Kristen R Scarpato; Alicia K Morgans
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Recurrent seminomas: clinical features and biologic implications.

Authors:  Avik Som; Rui Zhu; Charles C Guo; Eleni Efstathiou; Li Xiao; Louis L Pisters; Angabin Matin; Shi-Ming Tu
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 3.  [Therapy for recurrent testicular cancer].

Authors:  M Kuczyk; M Horstmann; A Merseburger; J Beyer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Update on management of seminoma.

Authors:  Emma J Alexander; Ingrid M White; Alan Horwich
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

Review 5.  [Salvage treatment in germ cell tumors : high-dose chemotherapy and the impact of prognostic factors].

Authors:  A Lorch; K Oechsle; C Bokemeyer; J Beyer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  The present and future of serum diagnostic tests for testicular germ cell tumours.

Authors:  Matthew J Murray; Robert A Huddart; Nicholas Coleman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  Pure seminoma: a review and update.

Authors:  Noureddine Boujelbene; Adrien Cosinschi; Nadia Boujelbene; Kaouthar Khanfir; Shushila Bhagwati; Eveleyn Herrmann; Rene-Olivier Mirimanoff; Mahmut Ozsahin; Abderrahim Zouhair
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 3.481

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.