OBJECTIVE: The primary goals in treating patients with diabetes are maintaining blood glucose levels as close to normal as possible and making a relatively normal quality of life achievable. Both of these goals are influenced by a multitude of somatic and psychological factors that should be seen as building a complex network. We examined whether a mathematical model can be construed that can depict the relative significance of each factor for achieving these treatment goals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 625 patients from 32 different treatment facilities were examined (224 type 1 and 401 type 2 diabetic patients) using HbA(1c) values (high-performance liquid chromatography), number of secondary illnesses, and standardized questionnaires with respect to health-related quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire), coping behavior (Freiburger Illness-Coping Strategies questionnaire), diabetes-specific knowledge (Test of Diabetes-Specific Knowledge), doctor-patient relationship (Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale), and personality characteristics (Giessen Test and Assessment of Beliefs in Self-Efficacy and Optimism). The analyses were carried out by means of a structural equation model. RESULTS: The model proved to be valid (chi(2) = 88.5, df = 76, P = 0.16), showing a sound fit (adjusted goodness of fit [AGFI] = 0.94). It explained 62% of the variance of the quality of life and 5% of the HbA(1c) values. Subjects characterized by strong beliefs in their self-efficacy and an optimistic outlook on life were more likely to be satisfied with their doctor-patient relationships. They demonstrated more active coping behavior and proved to have a higher quality of life. Active coping behavior was the only psychological variable significant for the HbA(1c) values. CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to illustrate the various factors involved and their mutual dependency and significance for the treatment goals. Belief in self-efficacy and active coping behavior appear to have the greatest relevance for achieving the primary treatment goals.
OBJECTIVE: The primary goals in treating patients with diabetes are maintaining blood glucose levels as close to normal as possible and making a relatively normal quality of life achievable. Both of these goals are influenced by a multitude of somatic and psychological factors that should be seen as building a complex network. We examined whether a mathematical model can be construed that can depict the relative significance of each factor for achieving these treatment goals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 625 patients from 32 different treatment facilities were examined (224 type 1 and 401 type 2 diabeticpatients) using HbA(1c) values (high-performance liquid chromatography), number of secondary illnesses, and standardized questionnaires with respect to health-related quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire), coping behavior (Freiburger Illness-Coping Strategies questionnaire), diabetes-specific knowledge (Test of Diabetes-Specific Knowledge), doctor-patient relationship (Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale), and personality characteristics (Giessen Test and Assessment of Beliefs in Self-Efficacy and Optimism). The analyses were carried out by means of a structural equation model. RESULTS: The model proved to be valid (chi(2) = 88.5, df = 76, P = 0.16), showing a sound fit (adjusted goodness of fit [AGFI] = 0.94). It explained 62% of the variance of the quality of life and 5% of the HbA(1c) values. Subjects characterized by strong beliefs in their self-efficacy and an optimistic outlook on life were more likely to be satisfied with their doctor-patient relationships. They demonstrated more active coping behavior and proved to have a higher quality of life. Active coping behavior was the only psychological variable significant for the HbA(1c) values. CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to illustrate the various factors involved and their mutual dependency and significance for the treatment goals. Belief in self-efficacy and active coping behavior appear to have the greatest relevance for achieving the primary treatment goals.
Authors: Christina N Massey; Emily H Feig; Laura Duque-Serrano; Deborah Wexler; Judith Tedlie Moskowitz; Jeff C Huffman Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Elizabeth W Holt; Paul Muntner; C Joyce; Donald E Morisky; Larry S Webber; Marie Krousel-Wood Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: M Trento; A Trinetta; C Kucich; G Grassi; P Passera; S Gennari; V Paganin; S Tedesco; L Charrier; F Cavallo; M Porta Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2010-05-03 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Joyce P Yi-Frazier; Ronald E Smith; Peter P Vitaliano; Jean C Yi; Scarlett Mai; Matthew Hillman; Katie Weinger Journal: Stress Health Date: 2010-01-01 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Christopher M Celano; Eleanor E Beale; Shannon V Moore; Deborah J Wexler; Jeff C Huffman Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.810