Literature DB >> 11772676

Emergency physician practices and requirements regarding the medical screening examination of psychiatric patients.

Kerry B Broderick1, E Brooke Lerner, John D McCourt, Emily Fraser, Killian Salerno.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the testing requirements and practices of emergency physicians (EPs) when conducting a medical screening examination of psychiatric patients.
METHODS: An anonymous survey was developed and mailed to 500 EPs randomly selected through American College of Emergency Physicians membership rolls.
RESULTS: Two hundred ninety surveys were returned (58%). Eighty-five percent of the respondents were male, 70% practiced in a community setting and 28% in an academic setting, 58% were emergency medicine (EM) residency-trained, and 88% were EM board-certified or board-eligible. Ninety-eight percent stated they were actively involved with the psychiatric medical screening exam (PMSE). Routine testing was required by 35% of the respondents, with 16% being required by ED protocol, and 84% by the psychiatrist/psychiatric institute. Of those with required testing, tests required were: complete blood cell count (56%), electrolytes (56%), serum alcohol (85%), serum toxicology screen (31%), urine toxicology screen (86%), electrocardiogram (18%), liver function test (16%), blood urea nitrogen (45%), and creatinine (40%). Many clinicians believed that certain tests were unnecessary as part of a PMSE. There was no statistical difference between the opinions of the physicians required to test and those not required to test in terms of which tests they thought were a necessary part of a PMSE regardless of the patient's clinical presentation. The EM-trained physicians were also found to be significantly less likely to think certain tests were necessary for the PMSE when compared with the non-EM-trained physicians.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine testing was required as part of the medical screening examination of psychiatric patients for only one-third of the respondents. Few respondents believed that any of these tests were necessary. Emergency medicine-trained physicians were less likely to feel that routine testing was necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11772676     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01173.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  5 in total

Review 1.  'Medical Clearance' of Patients With Acute Mental Health Needs in the Emergency Department: A Literature Review and Practice Recommendations.

Authors:  Tony W Thrasher; Martha Rolli; Robert S Redwood; Michael J Peterson; John Schneider; Lisa Maurer; Michael D Repplinger
Journal:  WMJ       Date:  2019-12

2.  Like the Eye of the Tiger: Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Exclusionary Criteria and Its "Knockout" of the Emergency Psychiatric Patient.

Authors:  Veronica Tucci; John Liu; Anu Matorin; Asim Shah; Nidal Moukaddam
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

Review 3.  American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Task Force on Medical Clearance of Adult Psychiatric Patients. Part II: Controversies over Medical Assessment, and Consensus Recommendations.

Authors:  Michael P Wilson; Kimberly Nordstrom; Eric L Anderson; Anthony T Ng; Leslie S Zun; Jennifer M Peltzer-Jones; Michael H Allen
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-05-01

Review 4.  American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Task Force on Medical Clearance of Adults Part I: Introduction, Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines.

Authors:  Eric L Anderson; Kimberly Nordstrom; Michael P Wilson; Jennifer M Peltzer-Jones; Leslie Zun; Anthony Ng; Michael H Allen
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-01-19

5.  Emergency Departments need Psychiatric Emergency Protocols!

Authors:  Bhavesh Jarwani
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.