Literature DB >> 11772557

Measurement carbon dioxide concentration does not affect root respiration of nine tree species in the field.

Andrew J Burton1, Kurt S Pregitzer.   

Abstract

Inhibition of respiration has been reported as a short-term response of tree roots to elevated measurement CO2 concentration ([CO2]), calling into question the validity of root respiration rates determined at CO2 concentrations that differ from the soil [CO2] in the rooting zone. Our objectives were to validate previous observations of a direct CO2 effect on root respiration in sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) and to determine if high [CO2] also inhibited root respiration in other tree species. Root respiration rates for nine common North American tree species were measured in the field at ambient soil temperature at both 350 and 1000 microl CO2 l-1. No evidence of direct inhibition of root respiration by elevated measurement [CO2] was found for any of the species tested. The ratio of respiration rates at 1000 and 350 microl CO2 l-1 ranged from 0.97 to 1.07, and the 95% confidence intervals for this ratio included unity for all species tested. Tests of a respiration cuvette used in earlier experiments suggested that gas leakage from the cuvette/IRGA system created an apparent direct CO2 effect on respiration of sugar maple roots when none actually existed. Small sample masses used in those experiments exacerbated the error. Careful attention to the possibility of gas leaks and the avoidance of small sample masses should produce data that will allow researchers to accurately assess whether direct effects of measurement [CO2] exist. Our findings of no direct CO2 effect on respiration of roots of a wide variety of species suggest that such effects may be less common than previously thought for tree roots.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11772557     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/22.1.67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  6 in total

1.  Fine-root respiration in a loblolly pine and sweetgum forest growing in elevated CO2.

Authors:  K George; R J Norby; J G Hamilton; E H DeLucia
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 10.151

2.  Role of carbohydrate supply in white and brown root respiration of ponderosa pine.

Authors:  Cynthia C Lipp; Christian P Andersen
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 3.  A starting guide to root ecology: strengthening ecological concepts and standardising root classification, sampling, processing and trait measurements.

Authors:  Grégoire T Freschet; Loïc Pagès; Colleen M Iversen; Louise H Comas; Boris Rewald; Catherine Roumet; Jitka Klimešová; Marcin Zadworny; Hendrik Poorter; Johannes A Postma; Thomas S Adams; Agnieszka Bagniewska-Zadworna; A Glyn Bengough; Elison B Blancaflor; Ivano Brunner; Johannes H C Cornelissen; Eric Garnier; Arthur Gessler; Sarah E Hobbie; Ina C Meier; Liesje Mommer; Catherine Picon-Cochard; Laura Rose; Peter Ryser; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Nadejda A Soudzilovskaia; Alexia Stokes; Tao Sun; Oscar J Valverde-Barrantes; Monique Weemstra; Alexandra Weigelt; Nina Wurzburger; Larry M York; Sarah A Batterman; Moemy Gomes de Moraes; Štěpán Janeček; Hans Lambers; Verity Salmon; Nishanth Tharayil; M Luke McCormack
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 10.323

4.  Respiratory oxygen uptake is not decreased by an instantaneous elevation of [CO2], but is increased with long-term growth in the field at elevated [CO2].

Authors:  Phillip A Davey; Stephen Hunt; Graham J Hymus; Evan H DeLucia; Bert G Drake; David F Karnosky; Stephen P Long
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-12-30       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Night temperature has a minimal effect on respiration and growth in rapidly growing plants.

Authors:  Jonathan M Frantz; Nilton N Cometti; Bruce Bugbee
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Flow of CO2 from soil may not correspond with CO2 concentration in soil.

Authors:  Jan Frouz; Luděk Bujalský
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.