Literature DB >> 11771979

Laser Doppler flowmetry mapping of cerebrocortical microflow: characteristics and limitations.

Ralf Steinmeier1, Imre Bondar, Christian Bauhuf, Rudolf Fahlbusch.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to quantitatively analyze the amount of methodological noise and the spatial and temporal variability of laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) signals mapping cerebrocortical microflow. In an experimental setup with latex beads, the methodological LDF-signal variability was determined (coefficient of variation or CV(method)). The biological variability of the LDF signals was measured in animal experiments using 10 anesthetized rabbits. One stationary reference probe was used to assess temporal heterogeneity (CV(temp)) and a micromanipulator-driven scanning probe was used to assess spatial heterogeneity (CV(spat)) in a cortical area of 3.5 x 4.5 mm with 252 measurement points. CO(2) tests were used to modulate cerebrovascular resistance. CV(method) was found to be 4.94 +/- 1.7. The CV(temp) for the LDF-velocity signal was assessed to be 13.93 +/- 5.9 during normocapnia. Scanning of the brain surface with the scanning probe revealed a CV(spat) for LDF velocity of 65.0 +/- 16.2 during normocapnia. CO(2) modulation (hypocapnia --> normocapnia --> hypercapnia) of the cerebral resistance did not show a significant change in temporal heterogeneity (10.84 +/- 3.1 --> 13.93 +/- 5.9 --> 14.82 +/- 3.9), whereas spatial heterogeneity decreased significantly (81.31 +/- 12.0 --> 65.0 +/- 16.2 --> 54.04 +/- 21.8). Although the spatial and temporal variability of LDF signals evoked by cerebrocortical microflow is in the same range as with other methods and in other organs, LDF cerebrocortical mapping is restricted by the large temporal and spatial heterogeneity of the cerebrocortical vasculature. The definitions of sample volume, scanning step width, probe to brain surface distance, and average time per scanning point are critical concerning reliable LDF cerebrocortical mapping techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11771979     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  5 in total

1.  Laser Doppler flux-metry as an experimental tool in laryngology.

Authors:  A Jacob; M A Birchall
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Longitudinal in vivo monitoring of rodent glioma models through thinned skull using laser speckle contrast imaging.

Authors:  Abhishek Rege; Alan C Seifert; Dan Schlattman; Yu Ouyang; Khan W Li; Luca Basaldella; Henry Brem; Betty M Tyler; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Self-mixing microprobe for monitoring microvascular perfusion in rat brain.

Authors:  Edite Figueiras; Ricardo Oliveira; Cátia F Lourenço; Rita Campos; Anne Humeau-Heurtier; Rui M Barbosa; João Laranjinha; Luis F Requicha Ferreira; Frits F M de Mul
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Chronic imaging of cortical blood flow using Multi-Exposure Speckle Imaging.

Authors:  Syed Mohammad Shams Kazmi; Ashwin B Parthasarthy; Nelly E Song; Theresa A Jones; Andrew K Dunn
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 5.  Expanding applications, accuracy, and interpretation of laser speckle contrast imaging of cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  S M Shams Kazmi; Lisa M Richards; Christian J Schrandt; Mitchell A Davis; Andrew K Dunn
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.200

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.