The effect of vertical and horizontal head positioning in panoramic radiography on mesiodistal tooth angulations.

The purposes of this study were to examine the effect of potentially common patient positioning errors in panoramic radiography on imaged mesiodistal tooth angulations and to compare these results with the imaged mesiodistal tooth angulations present at an idealized head position. A human skull served as the matrix into which a constructed typodont testing device was fixed according to anteroposterior and vertical cephalometric normals. The skull was then repeatedly imaged and repositioned five times at each of the following five head positions: ideal head position, 5 degrees right, 5 degrees left, 5 degrees up, and 5 degrees down. The images were scanned and digitized with custom software to determine the image mesiodistal tooth angulations. Results revealed that the majority of image angles from the five head positions were statistically significantly different than image angles from the idealized head position. Maxillary teeth were more sensitive to 5 degrees up/down head rotation, with 5 degrees up causing mesial projection and 5 degrees down causing distal projection of maxillary roots. Mandibular anterior teeth were more sensitive to 5 degrees right/left head rotation, with the projected mesiodistal angular difference between 5 degrees right and 5 degrees left rotation ranging from 4.0 degrees to 22.3 degrees. Maxillary teeth were relatively unaffected by 5 degrees right/left head rotation, and mandibular teeth were relatively unaffected by 5 degrees up/down head rotation. It was concluded that the clinical assessment of mesiodistal tooth angulation with panoramic radiography should be approached with extreme caution with an understanding of the inherent image distortions that can be further complicated by the potential for aberrant head positioning.