Literature DB >> 11770826

Evolution of the genomic systems of prokaryotes and its momentous consequences.

S Sonea1, L G Mathieu.   

Abstract

The earliest self-reproducing cell on Earth, our common ancestor, was probably as small as present-day bacteria. It gave rise to a very large and durable clone whose descendants must have been the only living occupants of the oceans for about one thousand million years. They reached astronomical numbers of separate, disjunct cells, and synthesized many new genes. Their small volume could not accommodate ever larger genomes and useful new genes replaced resident, less successful sequences, thus increasing diversity and the number of strains with highly specialized, distinct, bioenergetic potentialities. Also, selective pressure favored strains able to participate successfully in division of labor and in the sharing of diverse abilities in mixed communities, counterbalancing the limited capacities of individual genomes. Lateral gene transfer mechanisms appeared and were progressively improved, furthering the development of diversity. The prokaryotes' constructive evolution resulted in the formation of a worldwide web of genetic information, and a global bacterial superbiosystem (superorganism). By contrast, eukaryotic evolution of organisms has been typically Darwinian. Diversification of eukaryotic organisms was, however, considerably enriched and accelerated by symbioses with prokaryotes. The more broadly diversified bioenergetic potential of prokaryotes considerably increased the diversity of eukaryotes. Without their participation, our biosphere would have remained much less diverse and less dynamic. Environmental homeostasis has been maintained all along by guided bacterial evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11770826     DOI: 10.1007/s101230100015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Microbiol        ISSN: 1139-6709            Impact factor:   2.479


  5 in total

1.  Integrative microbiology--the third Golden Age.

Authors:  Maselio Schaechter
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 2.  How big is the iceberg of which organellar genes in nuclear genomes are but the tip?

Authors:  W F Doolittle; Y Boucher; C L Nesbø; C J Douady; J O Andersson; A J Roger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Physiology of the read-write genome.

Authors:  James A Shapiro
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Bacterial genome instability.

Authors:  Elise Darmon; David R F Leach
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 5.  Nothing in Evolution Makes Sense Except in the Light of Genomics: Read-Write Genome Evolution as an Active Biological Process.

Authors:  James A Shapiro
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.