M LeMier1, P Cummings, T A West. 1. Washington State Department of Health, Injury Prevention Program, Olympia, USA. mary.lemier@doh.wa.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of external cause of injury codes (E codes) reported in computerized hospital discharge records. METHODS: All civilian hospitals in Washington State submit computerized data for each hospital discharge to a file maintained by the Department of Health. In 1996, 32 hospitals accounted for 80% of the injury related discharges in this file; from these hospitals, we sampled 1,260 computerized records for injured patients in a stratified, but random, manner. An expert coder then visited the 32 study hospitals, reviewed the medical records that corresponded to each computerized record, and assigned an E code for that hospitalization. The computerized E code information was compared with codes provided by the expert reviewer. RESULTS: The incidence of hospitalization for injury based upon computerized hospital discharge data was very similar to that based upon chart review: incidence rate ratio 1.0 (95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.02). Computerized hospital discharge data correctly ranked injuries in regard to both mechanism and intent. Overall agreement on coding was 87% for mechanism of injury, 95% for intent of injury, and 66% for the complete E code. The sensitivity of computerized hospital discharge data for identification of falls, motor vehicle traffic injuries, poisonings, and firearm injuries was 91% or better. The predictive value positive of coding for these four categories of injury ranged from 88% for motor vehicle traffic injuries to 94% for poisonings. The amount of agreement for intent coding ranged from 84% for firearm injuries to 99% for falls. Agreement on coding of the complete E code ranged from 57% for firearm injuries to 72% for poisonings. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized hospital discharge data can be used with confidence to determine how many injuries are treated in a hospital setting and the relative magnitude of various categories of injury. E codes reported in hospital discharge data are a reliable source of information on the types of information most often used for injury related analyses and priority setting. The detail codes (complete E codes) reported in hospital discharge codes are less reliable and must be used with caution.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of external cause of injury codes (E codes) reported in computerized hospital discharge records. METHODS: All civilian hospitals in Washington State submit computerized data for each hospital discharge to a file maintained by the Department of Health. In 1996, 32 hospitals accounted for 80% of the injury related discharges in this file; from these hospitals, we sampled 1,260 computerized records for injured patients in a stratified, but random, manner. An expert coder then visited the 32 study hospitals, reviewed the medical records that corresponded to each computerized record, and assigned an E code for that hospitalization. The computerized E code information was compared with codes provided by the expert reviewer. RESULTS: The incidence of hospitalization for injury based upon computerized hospital discharge data was very similar to that based upon chart review: incidence rate ratio 1.0 (95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.02). Computerized hospital discharge data correctly ranked injuries in regard to both mechanism and intent. Overall agreement on coding was 87% for mechanism of injury, 95% for intent of injury, and 66% for the complete E code. The sensitivity of computerized hospital discharge data for identification of falls, motor vehicle traffic injuries, poisonings, and firearm injuries was 91% or better. The predictive value positive of coding for these four categories of injury ranged from 88% for motor vehicle traffic injuries to 94% for poisonings. The amount of agreement for intent coding ranged from 84% for firearm injuries to 99% for falls. Agreement on coding of the complete E code ranged from 57% for firearm injuries to 72% for poisonings. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized hospital discharge data can be used with confidence to determine how many injuries are treated in a hospital setting and the relative magnitude of various categories of injury. E codes reported in hospital discharge data are a reliable source of information on the types of information most often used for injury related analyses and priority setting. The detail codes (complete E codes) reported in hospital discharge codes are less reliable and must be used with caution.
Authors: Amanda R Patrick; Matthew Miller; Catherine W Barber; Philip S Wang; Claire F Canning; Sebastian Schneeweiss Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2010-10-03 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Jeanelle J Sugimoto-Matsuda; Earl S Hishinuma; Christie-Brianna K Momohara; Davis Rehuher; Fa'apisa M Soli; Randy Paul M Bautista; Janice Y Chang Journal: J Community Health Date: 2012-10
Authors: Sebastian Schneeweiss; Amanda R Patrick; Daniel H Solomon; Jyotsna Mehta; Colin Dormuth; Matthew Miller; Jennifer C Lee; Philip S Wang Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-05
Authors: Timothy F Platts-Mills; Katherine M Hunold; Denise A Esserman; Philip D Sloane; Samuel A McLean Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Raquel C Gardner; James F Burke; Jasmine Nettiksimmons; Sam Goldman; Caroline M Tanner; Kristine Yaffe Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2015-03-28 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Jing Wang; Steven A Sumner; Thomas R Simon; Alex E Crosby; Francis B Annor; Elizabeth Gaylor; Likang Xu; Kristin M Holland Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: David N Juurlink; Muhammad M Mamdani; Alexander Kopp; Nathan Herrmann; Andreas Laupacis Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.335