Literature DB >> 11770438

In situ fixation of grape berries.

P Diakou1, J P Carde.   

Abstract

Usual immersion protocols in aldehyde solutions fail to fully preserve the fine structure of both exocarp and mesocarp cells of grape berries, especially for the veraison (onset of ripening) and post-veraison stages. In exocarp cells, fixative diffusion is hampered by the thick polysaccharide cell walls. In mesocarp cells, plasma membrane and tonoplast are disrupted before aldehyde cross-linking occurs, owing to the high osmotic pressure and cell wall texture. The fixative was therefore injected under pressure as small droplets in the outer and inner parts of the fruit, with limited changes in the steady-state organization of fruit tissues. Compared to a selective range of immersion protocols, a striking improvement in cell preservation was observed for all berry tissues, allowing new information on various compartments of grape berry cells. The preservation of organ integrity and local concentration of aldehyde molecules are the most critical parameters of improved fixation. This technique may be applicable to a large array of fleshy fruits containing mainly cells comprising a high volumetric proportion of vacuoles accumulating large amounts of organic acids and sugars and bounded by thick-walled exocarp cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11770438     DOI: 10.1007/bf01306611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protoplasma        ISSN: 0033-183X            Impact factor:   3.356


  11 in total

1.  Technical Advance: Confocal measurement of the three-dimensional size and shape of plant parenchyma cells in a developing fruit tissue.

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.417

2.  Artefacts and morphological changes during chemical fixation.

Authors:  E Kellenberger; R Johansen; M Maeder; B Bohrmann; E Stauffer; W Villiger
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  Sugar accumulation in grape berries. Cloning of two putative vacuolar invertase cDNAs and their expression in grapevine tissues.

Authors:  C Davies; S P Robinson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Studies on the actions of glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, and mixtures of glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde on tissue proteins.

Authors:  S Kirkeby; D Moe
Journal:  Acta Histochem       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Relationships among pH, osmolality, and concentration of fixative solutions.

Authors:  M D Maser; T E Powell; C W Philpott
Journal:  Stain Technol       Date:  1967-07

Review 6.  Formaldehyde fixation.

Authors:  C H Fox; F B Johnson; J Whiting; P P Roller
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  The effect of heating by microwave irradiation and by conventional heating on the aldehyde concentration in aqueous glutaraldehyde solutions.

Authors:  J M Ruijgrok; M E Boon; J R De Wijn
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1990 Jun-Jul

8.  PHLOEM UNLOADING: Sieve Element Unloading and Post-Sieve Element Transport.

Authors:  J. W. Patrick
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1997-06

9.  Microwave energy fixation of plant tissue: an alternative approach that provides excellent preservation of ultrastructure and antigenicity.

Authors:  N Benhamou; S Noel; J Grenier; A Asselin
Journal:  J Electron Microsc Tech       Date:  1991-01

10.  Cell wall differentiation and stages involved with intercellular gas space opening.

Authors:  J C Roland
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  8 in total

1.  Transcriptomic and metabolite analyses of Cabernet Sauvignon grape berry development.

Authors:  Laurent G Deluc; Jérôme Grimplet; Matthew D Wheatley; Richard L Tillett; David R Quilici; Craig Osborne; David A Schooley; Karen A Schlauch; John C Cushman; Grant R Cramer
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Identification of grapevine aquaporins and expression analysis in developing berries.

Authors:  Romain Fouquet; Céline Léon; Nathalie Ollat; François Barrieu
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 4.570

3.  Cellular expansion and gene expression in the developing grape (Vitis vinifera L.).

Authors:  J Schlosser; N Olsson; M Weis; K Reid; F Peng; S Lund; P Bowen
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.356

4.  Solute accumulation differs in the vacuoles and apoplast of ripening grape berries.

Authors:  Markus Keller; Pradeep M Shrestha
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Berry flesh and skin ripening features in Vitis vinifera as assessed by transcriptional profiling.

Authors:  Diego Lijavetzky; Pablo Carbonell-Bejerano; Jérôme Grimplet; Gema Bravo; Pilar Flores; José Fenoll; Pilar Hellín; Juan Carlos Oliveros; José M Martínez-Zapater
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Enzyme activities and gene expression of starch metabolism provide insights into grape berry development.

Authors:  Xudong Zhu; Chaobo Zhang; Weimin Wu; Xiaopeng Li; Chuan Zhang; Jinggui Fang
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 6.793

7.  The common transcriptional subnetworks of the grape berry skin in the late stages of ripening.

Authors:  Ryan Ghan; Juli Petereit; Richard L Tillett; Karen A Schlauch; David Toubiana; Aaron Fait; Grant R Cramer
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.215

8.  Apoplastic sugar may be lost from grape berries and retrieved in pedicels.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Ben-Min Chang; Berenice Burdet; Zhanwu Dai; Serge Delrot; Markus Keller
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 8.005

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.