Literature DB >> 11770093

Comparison of interactive voice response and written self-administered patient surveys for clinical research.

J Agel1, T Rockwood, J C Mundt, J H Greist, M Swiontkowski.   

Abstract

This study compared the use of an interactive voice response (IVR) system with a written survey to collect data. Consecutive patients seen in an orthopedic clinic completed the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) by either IVR or written questionnaire and then were asked to complete the form again 3-7 days later using the opposite modality. Patient response rates were analyzed for differences between the self-administered IVR and written modes of administration. Three orthopedic clinics participated in the study. No significant differences between method of administration or individual differences in response per patient were found. Therefore, no significant differences in measurement are found when IVR is compared to the written SMFA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11770093     DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-20011201-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  9 in total

1.  Data equivalency of an interactive voice response system for home assessment of back pain and function.

Authors:  William S Shaw; Santosh K Verma
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.037

2.  Electronic versus paper diaries: a pilot study of concordance and adherence in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiation therapy.

Authors:  Joseph M Blondin; Khamis S Abu-Hasaballah; Howard Tennen; Rajesh V Lalla
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2010-10-18

3.  Evaluation of mode equivalence of the MSKCC Bowel Function Instrument, LASA Quality of Life, and Subjective Significance Questionnaire items administered by Web, interactive voice response system (IVRS), and paper.

Authors:  Antonia V Bennett; Kathleen Keenoy; Marwan Shouery; Ethan Basch; Larissa K Temple
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Difference in method of administration did not significantly impact item response: an IRT-based analysis from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative.

Authors:  Jakob B Bjorner; Matthias Rose; Barbara Gandek; Arthur A Stone; Doerte U Junghaenel; John E Ware
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Testing the measurement equivalence of paper and interactive voice response system versions of the EORTC QLQ-C30.

Authors:  J Jason Lundy; Stephen Joel Coons; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Method of administration of PROMIS scales did not significantly impact score level, reliability, or validity.

Authors:  Jakob B Bjorner; Matthias Rose; Barbara Gandek; Arthur A Stone; Doerte U Junghaenel; John E Ware
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Statistical considerations in the psychometric validation of outcome measures.

Authors:  Alla Sikorskii; Philip C Noble
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Mode equivalence and acceptability of tablet computer-, interactive voice response system-, and paper-based administration of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

Authors:  Antonia V Bennett; Amylou C Dueck; Sandra A Mitchell; Tito R Mendoza; Bryce B Reeve; Thomas M Atkinson; Kathleen M Castro; Andrea Denicoff; Lauren J Rogak; Jay K Harness; James D Bearden; Donna Bryant; Robert D Siegel; Deborah Schrag; Ethan Basch
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Feasibility of an automated telephone survey to enable prospective monitoring of subjects whose confidentiality is paramount: a four-week cohort study of partner violence recurrence after Emergency Department discharge.

Authors:  Douglas J Wiebe; Brendan G Carr; Elizabeth M Datner; Michael R Elliott; Therese S Richmond
Journal:  Epidemiol Perspect Innov       Date:  2008-01-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.