Literature DB >> 11768855

The accuracy of reaching movements in brief delay conditions.

D A Westwood1, M Heath, E A Roy.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that a highly accurate target representation is available to the visuomotor system in brief (< 2 s) delay conditions. Participants reached to single midsagittal targets (20, 25, 30, 35, 40 cm amplitude) in full vision, open-loop and delay conditions (500, 1,000, 1,500 or 2,000 ms). Radial endpoint error was significantly greater for open-loop than full vision reaches, and was greater still for all delay conditions, which did not differ from one another. Radial error was greater for farther targets, although this tended to hold only for delayed reaches. These data suggest that the visuomotor system switches from on-line visual information to a degraded, stored representation very soon (< 500 ms) if not immediately after target occlusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11768855     DOI: 10.1037/h0087377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  17 in total

1.  Different damping responses explain vertical endpoint error differences between visual conditions.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Chelsea M Soebbing; Allyson E French; Sara A Winges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Goal-directed reaching: movement strategies influence the weighting of allocentric and egocentric visual cues.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Ayla Tessmer; Gordon Binsted; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Anika Maraj; Ashlee Gradkowski; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visuomotor memory is independent of conscious awareness of target features.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Kristina A Neely; Jason Yakimishyn; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Integration of haptic and visual size cues in perception and action revealed through cross-modal conflict.

Authors:  Charles E Pettypiece; Melvyn A Goodale; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Contribution of visual and proprioceptive information to the precision of reaching movements.

Authors:  Simona Monaco; Gregory Króliczak; Derek J Quinlan; Patrizia Fattori; Claudio Galletti; Melvyn A Goodale; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The relationship between the implicit visuomotor control and the motor planning accuracy.

Authors:  Kosuke Numasawa; Takeshi Miyamoto; Tomohiro Kizuka; Seiji Ono
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  A perception-based ERP reveals that the magnitude of delay matters for memory-guided reaching.

Authors:  Leanna C Cruikshank; Jeremy B Caplan; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Sensory integration during reaching: the effects of manipulating visual target availability.

Authors:  Sajida Khanafer; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Müller-Lyer figures.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Kristina Neely
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.