Literature DB >> 11768850

Threshold 3: the feasibility of the Threshold Assessment Grid (TAG) for routine assessment of the severity of mental health problems.

M Slade1, S Cahill, W Kelsey, R Powell, G Strathdee, A Valiakalayil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice requires the development of measures which are suitable for everyday clinical use ('feasible'). There is no consensus as to how to establish feasibility.
METHOD: The feasibility of a new assessment - the Threshold Assessment Grid (TAG) - for use when making referrals to mental health services was tested by training mental health teams in using the TAG and other standardised assessments, asking referrers to ten mental health services in London also to complete a TAG, surveying TAG users, and evaluating a feedback meeting at which TAG data were presented.
RESULTS: One hundred and one (61%) mental health staff received training, and 445 (74%) referrers of 600 patients completed TAGs. Sixty-five (65%) questionnaires from TAG users were completed, and 24 (80%) people attending feedback meetings evaluated the TAG. These allowed the extent to which the TAG is brief, simple, relevant, acceptable, available and valuable to be investigated.
CONCLUSION: The TAG exhibited good feasibility when used by mental health staff, and moderate feasibility when used by referrers. This approach can be used to investigate the feasibility of other standardised assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11768850     DOI: 10.1007/s001270170017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol        ISSN: 0933-7954            Impact factor:   4.328


  4 in total

1.  Desire for information of people with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Domenico Giacco; Mario Luciano; Valeria Del Vecchio; Gaia Sampogna; Mike Slade; Eleanor Clarke; Marietta Nagy; Aniko Egerhazi; Povl Munk-Jørgensen; Malene Frøkjaer Krogsgaard Bording; Wolfram Kawohl; Wulf Rössler; Nadja Zentner; Bernd Puschner; Andrea Fiorillo
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  The Met Needs Index: a new metric for outcome assessment in mental health services.

Authors:  Erik Wennström; Lars Berglund; Johan Lindbäck
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  The development and evaluation of a five-language multi-perspective standardised measure: clinical decision-making involvement and satisfaction (CDIS).

Authors:  Mike Slade; Harriet Jordan; Eleanor Clarke; Paul Williams; Helena Kaliniecka; Katrin Arnold; Andrea Fiorillo; Domenico Giacco; Mario Luciano; Anikó Égerházi; Marietta Nagy; Malene Krogsgaard Bording; Helle Østermark Sørensen; Wulf Rössler; Wolfram Kawohl; Bernd Puschner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Potential predictive factors for successful referral from specialist mental-health services to less intensive treatment: A concept mapping study.

Authors:  Thijs Beckers; Bauke Koekkoek; Giel Hutschemaekers; Bea Tiemens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.