Literature DB >> 11768819

The crura and crura-sphincter pressure dynamics in patients with isolated upright and isolated supine reflux.

F Banki1, R J Mason, J A Hagen, C G Bremner, C G Streets, J H Peters, T R DeMeester.   

Abstract

The reason why patients with isolated supine reflux do not reflux in the upright position and patients with isolated upright reflux do not reflux in the supine position is unknown. Our objective was to determine the characteristics of the crura, lower esophageal sphincter, crura-sphincter dynamics, and esophageal body on manometry, endoscopy, and X-ray in patients with isolated upright and isolated supine reflux. Eighty consecutive patients with isolated upright reflux were compared with 82 consecutive patients with isolated supine reflux. Manometrically there was no difference in lower esophageal sphincter characteristics and esophageal contractions between the two groups. The prevalence of a hiatal hernia on manometry was similar between upright and supine refluxers (88% vs 88%). Upright refluxers had shorter hiatal hernias [median (interquartile range) 1.1 (0.65-1.8) vs 1.2 (1-2.3), P < 0.046)]. The median crural pressure, crura-sphincter pressure gradient, and crura-sphincter pressure ratio in upright refluxers was 14.96 (9.5-21.27), 3.28 (1.7-12.2), and 1.33 (0.87-2.8) mm Hg, respectively. These values were significantly higher (P < 0.001) in supine refluxers at 21.43 (16.6-29.9), 10.66 (4.3-19.7), and 2.1 (1.3-4.2) mm Hg, respectively. We conclude that the significantly higher crural pressure in patients with supine reflux acts as a mechanical ring and as a physiologic protector against the unfolding of the sphincter in the postprandial and upright periods. Higher crura-sphincter pressure gradient and larger-size hiatal hernias in patients with supine reflux results in pressurization of the hernia sac and subsequent reflux when these patients are in a supine position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11768819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  7 in total

1.  Endoscopic and manometric position-related characteristics of the normal gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Gordon Buduhan; Jeraldine Orlina; Brian Louie; Eric Vallieres; Ralph Aye
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Correlation of the gastroesophageal flap valve grade with the surgery rate in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Huseyin Ayhan Kayaoglu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Effect of "white diet" during bile monitoring with Bilitec 2000 on esophageal pH-metry in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Christian A Gutschow; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Wolfgang Schröder; Peter Collet; Jean-Marie Collard; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Toward an improved understanding of isolated upright reflux: positional effects on the lower esophageal sphincter in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Toshitaka Hoppo; Yoshihiro Komatsu; Alejandro Nieponice; Joan Schrenker; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Esophageal acid exposure in upright and recumbent postures: roles of lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal contractile and transport function, hiatal hernia, age, sex, and body mass.

Authors:  Georg Stacher; Johannes Lenglinger; Margit Eisler; Martha Hoffmann; Alexandra Goll; Helmar Bergmann; Giselheid Stacher-Janotta
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  The effect of hiatal hernia on gastroesophageal reflux disease and influence on proximal and distal esophageal reflux.

Authors:  Nurten Savas; Ulku Dagli; Burhan Sahin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Patients with upright reflux have less favorable postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic antireflux surgery than those with supine reflux.

Authors:  Emily R Winslow; Margaret M Frisella; Nathaniel J Soper; Ray E Clouse; Mary E Klingensmith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.267

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.