Literature DB >> 11768140

How much does a shared name make things similar? Linguistic labels, similarity, and the development of inductive inference.

V M Sloutsky1, Y F Lo, A V Fisher.   

Abstract

This article examines the development of inductive generalization, and presents a model of young children's induction and two experiments testing the model. The model specifies contribution of linguistic labels and perceptual similarity to young children's induction and predicts a correspondence between similarity judgment and induction of young children. In Experiment 1, 4- to 5-year-olds, 7- to 8-year-olds, and 11- to 12-year-olds were presented with triads of schematic faces (a Target and two Test stimuli), which varied in perceptual similarity, with one of the Test stimuli sharing a linguistic label with the Target, and another having a different label. Participants were taught an unobservable biological property about the Target and asked to generalize the property to one of the Test stimuli. Although 4- to 5-year-olds' proportions of label-based inductive generalizations varied with the degree of perceptual similarity among the compared stimuli, 11- to 12-year-olds relied exclusively on labels, and 7- to 8-year-olds appeared to be a transitional group. In Experiment 2 these findings were replicated using naturalistic stimuli (i.e., photographs of animals), with perceptual similarity manipulated by "morphing" naturalistic pictures into each other in a fixed number of steps. Overall results support predictions of the model and point to a developmental shift from treating linguistic labels as an attribute contributing to similarity to treating them as markers of a common category-a shift that appears to occur between 8 and 11 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11768140     DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  23 in total

1.  Naming and categorization in young children: II. Listener behavior training.

Authors:  Pauline J Horne; C Fergus Lowe; Valerie R L Randle
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Naive theory and transfer of learning: when less is more and more is less.

Authors:  Vladimir M Sloutsky; Margie A Spino
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

3.  Conceptual influences on induction: A case for a late onset.

Authors:  Vladimir M Sloutsky; Wei Sophia Deng; Anna V Fisher; Heidi Kloos
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Highlighting in Early Childhood: Learning Biases Through Attentional Shifting.

Authors:  Joseph M Burling; Hanako Yoshida
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-16

5.  Higher order, multifeatural object encoding by the oculomotor system.

Authors:  Devin H Kehoe; Selvi Aybulut; Mazyar Fallah
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Linguistic labels, dynamic visual features, and attention in infant category learning.

Authors:  Wei Sophia Deng; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2015-03-25

7.  The role of linguistic labels in inductive generalization.

Authors:  W Deng; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2012-12-25

8.  The influence of theoretical knowledge on similarity judgment.

Authors:  Hong-Mei Sun; Guo-En Yin
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-09-13

9.  Early word-learning entails reference, not merely associations.

Authors:  Sandra R Waxman; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Tracking Multiple Statistics: Simultaneous Learning of Object Names and Categories in English and Mandarin Speakers.

Authors:  Chi-Hsin Chen; Lisa Gershkoff-Stowe; Chih-Yi Wu; Hintat Cheung; Chen Yu
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.