Literature DB >> 11767973

Neuroprosthesis consumers' forum: consumer priorities for research directions.

K L Kilgore1, M Scherer, R Bobblitt, J Dettloff, D M Dombrowski, N Godbold, J W Jatich, R Morris, J S Penko, E S Schremp, L A Cash.   

Abstract

The purpose of this forum was to discuss with consumers having spinal cord injury what their research priorities would be for the field of functional electrical stimulation (FES) and to explore the impact of technology in the lives of people with disabilities. Both FES users and nonusers were included on the panel. The format for the discussion was primarily question and answer, with each participant giving his or her personal response to the moderator's question. Consumer research priorities depended on the individual and his or her personal priorities, preferences, background, history, and level of injury. Common themes that emerged were independence, ease of movement, ease of control, and spontaneity. From the consumers' perspective, the focus of research to restore function ought to be based on the needs and desires of the consumer, not just on the scientifically intriguing aspects of a particular technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11767973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  13 in total

1.  Client-centred assessment and the identification of meaningful treatment goals for individuals with a spinal cord injury.

Authors:  C Donnelly; J J Eng; J Hall; L Alford; R Giachino; K Norton; D S Kerr
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Exploratory study of perceived quality of life with implanted standing neuroprostheses.

Authors:  Loretta M Rohde; Bette R Bonder; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

3.  Standard task set for evaluating rehabilitation interventions for individuals with arm paralysis.

Authors:  Andrew S Cornwell; James Y Liao; Anne M Bryden; Robert F Kirsch
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

Review 4.  Neurophysiology and neural engineering: a review.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  In delicate balance: stem cells and spinal cord injury advocacy.

Authors:  Sara Parke; Judy Illes
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 6.  Training to achieve over ground walking after spinal cord injury: a review of who, what, when, and how.

Authors:  Jaynie F Yang; Kristin E Musselman
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Harmonization of Outcomes and Vision Endpoints in Vision Restoration Trials: Recommendations from the International HOVER Taskforce.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Joseph F Rizzo; Ian L Bailey; August Colenbrander; Gislin Dagnelie; Duane R Geruschat; Philip C Hessburg; Chris D McCarthy; Matthew A Petoe; Gary S Rubin; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 8.  Spinal cord injury: present and future therapeutic devices and prostheses.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

9.  Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jennifer L Collinger; Michael L Boninger; Tim M Bruns; Kenneth Curley; Wei Wang; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

10.  Real-time control of hind limb functional electrical stimulation using feedback from dorsal root ganglia recordings.

Authors:  Tim M Bruns; Joost B Wagenaar; Matthew J Bauman; Robert A Gaunt; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.