Literature DB >> 11767259

Finding common ground for effective campus-based prevention.

W Dejong1.   

Abstract

This commentary reviews the controversy over use of the term binge drinking to describe college student alcohol consumption, argues for abandoning the term, and explains how doing so will help unify and reinvigorate campus-based prevention work. Binge drinking has been defined for men as 5 or more drinks in a row at least once in the previous 2 weeks and as 4 or more drinks for women. There is no scientific basis for focusing on this measure to the exclusion of other consumption measures; neither is there justification for labeling such consumption binge drinking, which reinforces an exaggerated view of student drinking. To build support for environmental management strategies to reduce alcohol-related problems, campus officials should avoid terminology that demonizes students and instead embrace the responsible majority of college students as an essential part of the solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11767259     DOI: 10.1037//0893-164x.15.4.292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav        ISSN: 0893-164X


  10 in total

1.  Correlates of protective behavior utilization among heavy-drinking college students.

Authors:  Scott T Walters; Bahman S Roudsari; Amanda M Vader; T Robert Harris
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Heavy Drinking and Polydrug Use among College Students.

Authors:  Kevin E O'Grady; Amelia M Arria; Dawn M B Fitzelle; Eric D Wish
Journal:  J Drug Issues       Date:  2008

3.  Drinking beyond the binge threshold in a clinical sample of adolescents.

Authors:  Kasey G Creswell; Tammy Chung; Carillon J Skrzynski; Rachel L Bachrach; Kristina M Jackson; Duncan B Clark; Christopher S Martin
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  One size should not fit all, so use the right tool for the job.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Mary Beth Miller
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 5.  Questioning the validity of the 4+/5+ binge or heavy drinking criterion in college and clinical populations.

Authors:  Matthew R Pearson; Megan Kirouac; Katie Witkiewitz
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  A new measure of binge drinking: prevalence and correlates in a probability sample of undergraduates.

Authors:  James A Cranford; Sean Esteban McCabe; Carol J Boyd
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  My student body: a high-risk drinking prevention web site for college students.

Authors:  Emil Chiauzzi; Traci Craig Green; Sarah Lord; Christina Thum; Marion Goldstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2005 May-Jun

8.  The search for an elusive cutoff remains: Problems of binary classification of heavy drinking as an endpoint for alcohol clinical trials.

Authors:  Matthew R Pearson; Adrian J Bravo; Megan Kirouac; Katie Witkiewitz
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Heavy episodic drinking: determining the predictive utility of five or more drinks.

Authors:  Kristina M Jackson
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2008-03

10.  Binge alcohol drinking before pregnancy is closely associated with the development of macrosomia: Korean pregnancy registry cohort.

Authors:  Seul Koo; Ji Yeon Kim; Ji Hye Park; Gu Seob Roh; Nam Kyoo Lim; Hyun Young Park; Won-Ho Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.