Literature DB >> 11766957

The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe.

R Haigh1, A Tennant, F Biering-Sørensen, G Grimby, C Marincek, S Phillips, H Ring, L Tesio, J L Thonnard.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to survey the use of outcome measures in rehabilitation within Europe. It was envisaged that this would provide the basis for further studies on the cross-cultural validity of outcome measures. A postal questionnaire was distributed in November 1998 to 866 units providing rehabilitation. In total, 418 questionnaires were returned, corresponding to a response rate of 48%. These 418 centres treated an estimated 113,000 patients annually, undertaking 360,000 assessments. The survey focused on nine diagnostic groups: hip and knee replacement, low back pain, lower limb amputees, multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, spinal cord lesions, stroke and traumatic brain injury. It identified a relatively small number of dominant outcome assessments for each diagnostic group and some variation in the preference for measures across regions. A large number of measures, however, are being used in one or a small number of locations and with relatively few patients. For rehabilitation of orthopaedic patients the majority of assessments undertaken are at the impairment level. For patients with neurological disorders the emphasis is mostly upon measures of disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11766957     DOI: 10.1080/165019701753236464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1650-1977            Impact factor:   2.912


  20 in total

1.  [Item response theory and its application in neurology. Measurement of activity limitations in neurologic patients].

Authors:  S Gauggel; M Böcker; P Zimmermann; C Privou; D Lutz
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  A survey of physiotherapists' experience using outcome measures in total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C McAuley; M D Westby; A Hoens; D Troughton; R Field; M Duggan; W D Reid
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Rasch analysis of 24-, 18- and 11-item versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  Megan Davidson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  A Core Set of Outcome Measures for Adults With Neurologic Conditions Undergoing Rehabilitation: A CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moore; Kirsten Potter; Kathleen Blankshain; Sandra L Kaplan; Linda C OʼDwyer; Jane E Sullivan
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Emerging evidence-based physical rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis - towards an inventory of current content across Europe.

Authors:  Kamila Rasova; Peter Feys; Thomas Henze; Hans van Tongeren; Davide Cattaneo; Johanna Jonsdottir; Alena Herbenova
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Colombian Physiotherapists' Use of Functional Outcome Measures in Their Practice.

Authors:  Cristian Renteria; Katherine Berg
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.037

7.  Physiotherapy for Parkinson's Disease in Sweden: Provision, Expertise, and Multi-professional Collaborations.

Authors:  David Conradsson; Breiffni Leavy; Maria Hagströmer; Maria H Nilsson; Erika Franzén
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2017-08-20

8.  Development of a clinical tool for rating the body function categories of the ICF generic-30/rehabilitation set in Japanese rehabilitation practice and examination of its interrater reliability.

Authors:  Yuki Senju; Masahiko Mukaino; Birgit Prodinger; Melissa Selb; Yuki Okouchi; Kouji Mizutani; Megumi Suzuki; Shin Yamada; Shin-Ichi Izumi; Shigeru Sonoda; Yohei Otaka; Eiichi Saitoh; Gerold Stucki
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Assessment set for evaluation of clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis: psychometric properties.

Authors:  Kamila Rasova; Patricia Martinkova; Jana Vyskotova; Michaela Sedova
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2012-10-11

10.  Can manual ability be measured with a generic ABILHAND scale? A cross-sectional study conducted on six diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Carlyne Arnould; Laure Vandervelde; Charles Sèbiyo Batcho; Massimo Penta; Jean-Louis Thonnard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.