Literature DB >> 11766363

[Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial 17 case report].

G Kawabata1, I Hara, S Hara, S Isotani, Y Sakai, Y Wada, H Miyake, A Gotoh, H Chokyu, M Fujisawa, H Okada, S Kamidono, S Arakawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We report our early experience of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostatic cancer. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Between April and December 2000, 17 patients with clinical stage T1c to T2b prostatic cancer underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The median age was 70.9 year old, the median preoperative PSA and the median Gleason score of biopsy specimens was 7.1 ng/ml, 6, respectively. We followed the operation technique from the "Montsouris technique". Briefly, we used five trocars (two 10-mm and three 5-mm trocars) and the operation was performed transperitoneally. Pelvic lymph node dissection was performed in only one patient (case 3). Urethrovesical anastomosis was performed with 6 to 9 interrupted 3-0 absorbable sutures.
RESULTS: No conversion to open surgery or reoperation was required in all cases. Median operation time was 450 minutes (range 290 to 750) and median intraoperative bleeding (including urine) was 600 ml (range 100 to 3,135). Only one case (case 3) needed homologous blood transfusion. Median postoperative Foley catheterization period was 9 days (range 5 to 19). Intraoperative complications related to operation procedure were one rectal injury and three vesical injuries, which were treated by absorbable suturing laparoscopically. Major complication was one complete A-V block (case 3) who was required a transient discontinuance of the procedure. Surgical margins were negative in 13 cases. Postoperative pathological evaluation was one pT0, five pT2a, seven pT2b and four pT3a. PSA value decreased less than 0.2 ng/ml after surgery in all patients. Although six months have passed after the surgery in only 4 patients, all of them were fully continent.
CONCLUSION: Although the operation time is still longer than that of conventional open procedures, intraoperative magnified vision allows a more precise and safer dissection, especially for apical dissection. We believe that operative time will decrease with more experience. These results show that laparoscopic radical prostatectomy can be an acceptable treatment option for localized prostatic cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11766363     DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.92.647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi        ISSN: 0021-5287


  2 in total

Review 1.  Japanese experience with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Isao Hara; Gaku Kawabata
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Prostate cancer in Asia: A collaborative report.

Authors:  Rui Chen; Shancheng Ren; Ming Kwong Yiu; Ng Chi Fai; Wai Sam Cheng; Lap Hong Ian; Seiji Naito; Tadashi Matsuda; Elijah Kehinde; Ali Kural; Jason Yichun Chiu; Rainy Umbas; Qiang Wei; Xiaolei Shi; Liqun Zhou; Jian Huang; Yiran Huang; Liping Xie; Lulin Ma; Changjun Yin; Danfeng Xu; Kexin Xu; Zhangqun Ye; Chunxiao Liu; Dingwei Ye; Xin Gao; Qiang Fu; Jianquan Hou; Jianlin Yuan; Dalin He; Tiejun Pan; Qiang Ding; Fengshuo Jin; Benkang Shi; Gongxian Wang; Xiuheng Liu; Dongwen Wang; Zhoujun Shen; Xiangbo Kong; Wanhai Xu; Yaoliang Deng; Haibo Xia; Alexa N Cohen; Xu Gao; Chuanliang Xu; Yinghao Sun
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2015-04-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.