Literature DB >> 11766123

Trichloroethylene, trichloroacetic acid, and dichloroacetic acid: do they affect fetal rat heart development?

J W Fisher1, S R Channel, J S Eggers, P D Johnson, K L MacMahon, C D Goodyear, G L Sudberry, D A Warren, J R Latendresse, L J Graeter.   

Abstract

Trichloroethylene (TCE), trichloroacetic acid (TCA), and dichloroacetic acid (DCA) are commonly found as groundwater contaminants in many regions of the United States. Cardiac birth defects in children have been associated with TCE, and laboratory studies with rodents report an increased incidence of fetal cardiac malformations resulting from maternal exposures to TCE, TCA, and DCA. The objective of this study was to orally treat pregnant CDR(CD) Sprague-Dawley rats with large bolus doses of either TCE (500 mg/kg), TCA (300 mg/kg), or DCA (300 mg/kg) once per day on days 6 through 15 of gestation to determine the effectiveness of these materials to induce cardiac defects in the fetus. All-trans retinoic acid (RA) dissolved in soybean oil was used as a positive control. Soybean oil is commonly used as a dosing vehicle for RA teratology studies and was also used in this study as a dosing vehicle for TCE. Water was used as the dosing vehicle for TCA and DCA. Fetal hearts were examined on gestation day (GD) 21 by an initial in situ, cardiovascular stereomicroscope examination, and then followed by a microscopic dissection and examination of the formalin-fixed heart. The doses selected for TCA and DCA resulted in a modest decrease in maternal weight gain during gestation (3% to 8%). The fetal weights on GD 21 in the TCA and DCA treatment groups were decreased 8% and 9%, respectively, compared to the water control group and 21% in the RA treatment group compared to soybean oil control group. The heart malformation incidence for fetuses from the TCE-, TCA-, and DCA-treated dams did not differ from control values on a per fetus or per litter basis. The rate of heart malformations, on a per fetus basis, ranged from 3% to 5% for TCE, TCA, and DCA treatment groups compared to 6.5% and 2.9% for soybean oil and water control groups. The RA treatment group was significantly higher with 33% of the fetuses displaying heart defects. For TCE, TCA, and DCA treatment groups 42% to 60% of the litters contained at least one fetus with a heart malformation, compared to 52% and 37% of the litters in the soybean oil and water control groups. For the RA treatment group, 11 of 12 litters contained at least one fetus with a heart malformation. Further research is needed to quantify the spontaneous rates of heart defects for vehicle control rats and to explain the disparity between findings in the present study and other reported findings on the fetal cardiac teratogenicity of TCE, TCA, and DCA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11766123     DOI: 10.1080/109158101753252992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Toxicol        ISSN: 1091-5818            Impact factor:   2.032


  12 in total

1.  Trichloroethylene exposure in mid-pregnancy decreased fetal weight and increased placental markers of oxidative stress in rats.

Authors:  Rita Loch-Caruso; Iman Hassan; Sean M Harris; Anjana Kumar; Faith Bjork; Lawrence H Lash
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  Trichloroethylene metabolite S-(1,2-dichlorovinyl)-l-cysteine induces lipid peroxidation-associated apoptosis via the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways in a first-trimester placental cell line.

Authors:  Elana R Elkin; Sean M Harris; Rita Loch-Caruso
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Trichloroethylene perturbs HNF4a expression and activity in the developing chick heart.

Authors:  Alondra P Harris; Kareem A Ismail; Martha Nunez; Ira Martopullo; Alejandro Lencinas; Ornella I Selmin; Raymond B Runyan
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.372

4.  Placenta as a target of trichloroethylene toxicity.

Authors:  Elana R Elkin; Sean M Harris; Anthony L Su; Lawrence H Lash; Rita Loch-Caruso
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.238

5.  Exposure to low-dose trichloroethylene alters shear stress gene expression and function in the developing chick heart.

Authors:  Om Makwana; Nicholas M P King; Lauren Ahles; Ornella Selmin; Henk L Granzier; Raymond B Runyan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Toxicol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Toxicity assessments of selected trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene metabolites in three in vitro human placental models.

Authors:  Elana R Elkin; Anthony L Su; Brian A Kilburn; Kelly M Bakulski; D Randall Armant; Rita Loch-Caruso
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.421

7.  Altered cardiac function and ventricular septal defect in avian embryos exposed to low-dose trichloroethylene.

Authors:  Echoleah S Rufer; Timothy A Hacker; George R Flentke; Victoria J Drake; Matthew J Brody; John Lough; Susan M Smith
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Trichloroethylene exposure during cardiac valvuloseptal morphogenesis alters cushion formation and cardiac hemodynamics in the avian embryo.

Authors:  Victoria J Drake; Stacy L Koprowski; John Lough; Norman Hu; Susan M Smith
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Human health effects of trichloroethylene: key findings and scientific issues.

Authors:  Weihsueh A Chiu; Jennifer Jinot; Cheryl Siegel Scott; Susan L Makris; Glinda S Cooper; Rebecca C Dzubow; Ambuja S Bale; Marina V Evans; Kathryn Z Guyton; Nagalakshmi Keshava; John C Lipscomb; Stanley Barone; John F Fox; Maureen R Gwinn; John Schaum; Jane C Caldwell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  A systematic evaluation of the potential effects of trichloroethylene exposure on cardiac development.

Authors:  Susan L Makris; Cheryl Siegel Scott; John Fox; Thomas B Knudsen; Andrew K Hotchkiss; Xabier Arzuaga; Susan Y Euling; Christina M Powers; Jennifer Jinot; Karen A Hogan; Barbara D Abbott; E Sidney Hunter; Michael G Narotsky
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 3.421

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.