Literature DB >> 11764069

Pathologists' assistants practice: a measurement of performance.

C O Galvis1, S S Raab, F D'Amico, D M Grzybicki.   

Abstract

Despite their widespread utilization, little is known about the quality of pathologists' assistants' services. Pathologists' assistants' performance was compared with pathology residents' performance using the metrics of lymph node retrieval and tissue resubmission rates. Lymph node retrieval was calculated by retrospective review of surgical pathology reports from a sample of axillary dissection, mastectomy, and colorectal specimens. Tissue resubmission rates were calculated by retrospective review of a sample of general surgical pathology reports. Pathologists' assistants retrieved a significantly greater total number of lymph nodes compared with pathology residents; however, there was no difference in the total number of positive lymph nodes retrieved. Cases for which pathologists' assistants performed the gross examination had a significantly decreased resubmission rate compared with those performed by residents. In this setting, the gross examination performance of pathologists' assistants was equivalent to or superior to that of pathology residents. These results provide the first information available relating to pathologists' assistants' performance in surgical pathology.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11764069     DOI: 10.1309/BYM0-A5UK-2FRL-MRDL

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  4 in total

1.  The impact of involvement of biomedical scientists in specimen dissection and selection of blocks for histopathology: a study of time benefits and specimen handling quality in Ayrshire and Arran area laboratory.

Authors:  F R Duthie; E R Nairn; A W Milne; V McTaggart; D Topping
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Pathologist's assistant (PathA) and his/her role in the surgical pathology department: a systematic review and a narrative synthesis.

Authors:  M Bortesi; V Martino; M Marchetti; A Cavazza; G Gardini; E Zanetti; M C Bassi; L Ghirotto; M Costantini; Simonetta Piana
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Challenging the feasibility and clinical significance of current guidelines on lymph node examination in rectal cancer in the era of neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Anand Govindarajan; Mithat Gönen; Martin R Weiser; Jinru Shia; Larissa K Temple; Jose G Guillem; Philip B Paty; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Factors affecting the number of lymph nodes retrieved in colorectal cancer specimens.

Authors:  Michelle A Ostadi; Julie L Harnish; Stacey Stegienko; David R Urbach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.