Literature DB >> 11763929

Cavity wall adaptation of resin-based composites lined with flowable composites.

D Estafan1, A Estafan, K F Leinfelder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the adhesion of a flowable resin-based composite (RBC) vs. a condensable RBC to tooth structure using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen recently extracted human teeth were prepared for Class I restorations and equally divided into three groups. Group 1 was filled with Heliomolar bonded with Syntac Single Component. Group 2 was lined with Flow-It in addition to ALERT condensable RBC bonded with Bond-1 Primer/Adhesive. Group 3 was filled with ALERT bonded with Bond-1 Primer/Adhesive. All teeth were thermocycled, sectioned and evaluated for gap formation with the SEM.
RESULTS: SEM at x15 demonstrated that restorations with the flowable RBC at the tooth/restoration interface showed no evidence of marginal gaps between the RBC material or at the underlying tooth structure. A significant difference (P < 0.05) in wall adaptation was found between Groups 2 and 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11763929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  8 in total

1.  In vivo interfacial adaptation of class II resin composite restorations with and without a flowable resin composite liner.

Authors:  Anders Lindberg; J W V van Dijken; P Hörstedt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effect of different placement techniques on marginal microleakage of deep class-II cavities restored with two composite resin formulations.

Authors:  Radhika M; Girija S Sajjan; Kumaraswamy B N; Neetu Mittal
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-01

3.  The effect of a new-generation flowable composite resin on microleakage in Class V composite restorations as an intermediate layer.

Authors:  Soley Arslan; Sezer Demirbuga; Yakup Ustun; Asiye Nur Dincer; Burhan Can Canakci; Yahya Orcun Zorba
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-05

4.  Evaluation of gingival microleakage of class II resin composite restorations with fiber inserts: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Rs Basavanna; Anish Garg; Ravi Kapur
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2012-04

5.  Evaluation of Gingival Microleakage in Class II Composite Restorations with Different Lining Techniques: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Vedavathi Bore Gowda; B V Sreenivasa Murthy; Swaroop Hegde; Swapna Devarasanahalli Venkataramanaswamy; Veena Suresh Pai; Rashmi Krishna
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2015-11-29

6.  Effect of Camphorquinone Concentration in Physical-Mechanical Properties of Experimental Flowable Resin Composites.

Authors:  Dayany da Silva Alves Maciel; Arnaldo Bonfim Caires-Filho; Marta Fernandez-Garcia; Camillo Anauate-Netto; Roberta Caroline Bruschi Alonso
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Analysis of Base Monomer Elution from 3 Flowable Bulk-Fill Composite Resins Using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC).

Authors:  Ryta Łagocka; Małgorzata Mazurek-Mochol; Katarzyna Jakubowska; Maja Bendyk-Szeffer; Dariusz Chlubek; Jadwiga Buczkowska-Radlińska
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-07-07

8.  Comparative in vitro evaluation of internal adaptation of resin-modified glass ionomer, flowable composite and bonding agent applied as a liner under composite restoration: A scanning electron microscope study.

Authors:  M Soubhagya; K Mallikarjun Goud; B S Deepak; Sophia Thakur; T N Nandini; J Arun
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.