Literature DB >> 11763545

A method for estimating time dependent intervention benefits under arbitrarily varying age and exogenous components of hazard.

R C Brunet1, C J Struchiner, A Loinaz.   

Abstract

A method for estimating the dependence of intrinsic intervention benefits on time elapsed since the intervention took place is proposed. The method is aimed at intervention programs against diseases where one or all of the following components of hazard intensity may undergo important and unknown variations: 1) the intervention benefits to a subject are a function of the time elapsed since the intervention took place, or since inception for a continuing treatment, 2) the subjects vulnerability is an unknown function of their age, 3) the exogenous or environmental baseline intensity, to which all are assumed subjected, fluctuates arbitrarily with calendar time. During the time span of a study, these variables interact in a complex way, possibly masking the real contribution of the intervention. However, with very general assumptions about how hazard components interact, the cumulative hazards of subpopulations treated at different times in the past are shown to be described mathematically by a convolution of the time elapsed dependent intervention benefit function with the age and calendar time dependent baseline intensity. Starting from the cumulative hazards of untreated and treated subpopulations that had the intervention at different times in the past, a method of deconvolution through regularization is proposed to reconstruct the time elapsed dependence of the intervention benefit function. The regularization technique used is of the 'penalized least square smoothing' type, it is applied to the solution of Volterra integral equations of the first kind under noisy inputs. Simulations, to test for the reconstruction of different modes of time elapsed variation of the intervention benefits, are carried out on realistically noisy 'data sets' taken to be available at a limited number of time points. The stability of the estimated reconstructions, to measurement errors, is examined through repeated simulations with random noise added to inputs. The method is applied to a Brazilian data set where BCG vaccination resulted in a small reduction in the cumulated risk of leprosy infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11763545     DOI: 10.1023/a:1012548815575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  11 in total

1.  Analyzing effects of vaccines.

Authors:  A Svensson
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.144

Review 2.  Direct and indirect effects in vaccine efficacy and effectiveness.

Authors:  M E Halloran; M Haber; I M Longini; C J Struchiner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Rate estimation from prevalence information on a simple epidemiologic model for health interventions.

Authors:  R C Brunet; C J Struchiner
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 4.  Assessing vaccine efficacy in the field. Further observations.

Authors:  W A Orenstein; R H Bernier; A R Hinman
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  [Leprosy epidemiology in a cohort of household contacts in Rio de Janeiro (1987-1991)].

Authors:  H J de Matos; N Duppre; M F Alvim; L M MachadoVieira; E N Sarno; C J Struchiner
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.632

6.  On measures and models for the effectiveness of vaccines and vaccination programmes.

Authors:  S Greenland; R R Frerichs
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  On the distribution of vaccine protection under heterogeneous response.

Authors:  R C Brunet; C J Struchiner; M E Halloran
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.144

8.  Assessment of the protective efficacy of vaccines against common diseases using case-control and cohort studies.

Authors:  P G Smith; L C Rodrigues; P E Fine
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Measures of the effects of vaccination in a randomly mixing population.

Authors:  M Haber; I M Longini; M E Halloran
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Interpretation and estimation of vaccine efficacy under heterogeneity.

Authors:  M E Halloran; M Haber; I M Longini
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  1 in total

1.  Randomization and baseline transmission in vaccine field trials.

Authors:  C J Struchiner; M E Halloran
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.451

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.