Literature DB >> 11760804

Familial form of cerebral cavernous malformations: evaluation of gradient-spin-echo (GRASE) imaging in lesion detection and characterization at 1.5 T.

L Brunereau1, C Leveque, P Bertrand, E Tranquart, Y Cordoliani, P Rouleau, P Labauge.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the turbo gradient-spin-echo sequence (GRASE) in the MR assessment of the familial form of cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM). Twenty-one patients (15 male, six female) aged from 21 to 68 years (mean = 42.2 years) were prospectively examined with cerebral MR imaging, including T2-weighted turbo gradient-spin-echo (TGSE), turbo spin-echo (TSE) and gradient-echo (GRE) sequences. All sequences were performed in the same plane, the same matrix and the same field of view and were analyzed for signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), susceptibility effects, number of CCM, size of CCM and signal of CCM. It was found that SNR and CNR in the TGSE sequence were significantly inferior to those in both TSE and GRE sequences. TGSE and TSE sequences were significantly less prone to susceptibility effects than the GRE sequence. The sensitivity of TGSE and TSE sequences in detecting CCM was significantly lower than that of the GRE sequence. TGSE and TSE sequences provided comparable information about CCM size and signal. It was concluded that GRASE imaging was less sensitive than the GRE sequence in the detection of CCM and provided information similar to that yielded by the TSE sequence in the characterization of lesions, but with a higher number of artifacts. GRASE imaging cannot therefore replace TSE or GRE sequences in the MR evaluation of the familial form of CCM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11760804     DOI: 10.1007/s002340100628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  3 in total

1.  Radiological features of childhood giant cavernous malformations.

Authors:  Burce Ozgen; Efsun Senocak; Kader K Oguz; Figen Soylemezoglu; Nejat Akalan
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Cavernous malformations: natural history, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Sachin Batra; Doris Lin; Pablo F Recinos; Jun Zhang; Daniele Rigamonti
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 3.  Emerging clinical imaging techniques for cerebral cavernous malformations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter G Campbell; Pascal Jabbour; Sanjay Yadla; Issam A Awad
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.047

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.