Literature DB >> 11759425

Systematic reviews: the heart of evidence-based practice.

K R Stevens1.   

Abstract

Research utilization approaches in nursing recently have been replaced by evidence-based practice (EBP) approaches. The heart of the new EBP paradigm is the systematic review. Systematic reviews are carefully synthesized research evidence designed to answer focused clinical questions. Systematic reviews (also known as evidence summaries and integrative reviews) implement recently developed scientific methods to summarize results from multiple research studies. Specific strategies are required for success in locating systematic reviews. Major sources of systematic reviews for use by advanced practice nurses in acute and critical care are the Online Journal of Knowledge Synthesis for Nursing, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and the Cochrane Library. This discussion describes systematic reviews as the pivotal point in today's paradigm of EBP and guides the advanced practice nurse in locating and accessing systematic reviews for use in practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11759425     DOI: 10.1097/00044067-200111000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AACN Clin Issues        ISSN: 1079-0713


  7 in total

Review 1.  Systematic reviews need systematic searchers.

Authors:  Jessie McGowan; Margaret Sampson
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2005-01

Review 2.  A systematic review of functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

Authors:  Reuben Escorpizo; Monika E Finger; Andrea Glässel; Felix Gradinger; Miriam Lückenkemper; Alarcos Cieza
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-06

3.  PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews.

Authors:  Abigail M Methley; Stephen Campbell; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Rosalind McNally; Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Living systematic reviews in rehabilitation science can improve evidence-based healthcare.

Authors:  S Elbers; H Wittink; U Kaiser; J Kleijnen; J Pool; A Köke; R Smeets
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-07

Review 5.  A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools.

Authors:  Persis Katrak; Andrea E Bialocerkowski; Nicola Massy-Westropp; Saravana Kumar; Karen A Grimmer
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 6.  Barriers and facilitators of nursing research utilization in Iran: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mahnaz Sanjari; Hamid Reza Baradaran; Maryam Aalaa; Neda Mehrdad
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

Review 7.  What Synthesis Methodology Should I Use? A Review and Analysis of Approaches to Research Synthesis.

Authors:  Kara Schick-Makaroff; Marjorie MacDonald; Marilyn Plummer; Judy Burgess; Wendy Neander
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2016-03-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.