Literature DB >> 11757808

Prediction of lean body mass from multifrequency segmental impedance: influence of adiposity.

A Tagliabue1, A Andreoli, M Comelli, S Bertoli, G Testolin, G Oriani, A De Lorenzo.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the influence of adiposity on the relationship between bioelectrical impedance (BIA) measurements of body segments and estimation of body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Multiple frequencies of whole body and segmental impedances were measured in 68 normal-weight and obese subjects (46 women and 22 men), mean age 37.2+/-14.8 years (range, 18-69). Total and appendicular lean body mass (LBM) assessed by DXA correlated significantly with total and segmental impedance values adjusted for stature in both obese and normal-weight subjects. Best fitting equations for the prediction of appendicular LBM from segmental impedance measurements were derived for the arm and leg with and without the inclusion of adiposity (the percentage of body fat measured by DXA) in the regression models. Best prediction was obtained at low frequency for the arm and high frequency for the leg. Adiposity appears to significantly influence the prediction of leg LBM by BIA. These preliminary observations need further validation to provide an accurate assessment of appendicular LBM assessment by BIA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11757808     DOI: 10.1007/s005920170020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Diabetol        ISSN: 0940-5429            Impact factor:   4.280


  5 in total

1.  Reliability and accuracy of segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis for assessing muscle and fat mass in older Europeans: a comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Katharina Mally; Jens Trentmann; Martin Heller; Manuela Dittmar
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  A comparison of three bioelectrical impedance analyses for predicting lean body mass in a population with a large difference in muscularity.

Authors:  Noriko Ishiguro; Hiroaki Kanehisa; Masae Miyatani; Yoshihisa Masuo; Tetsuo Fukunaga
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Reference Values and Age Differences in Body Composition of Community-Dwelling Older Japanese Men and Women: A Pooled Analysis of Four Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Satoshi Seino; Shoji Shinkai; Katsuya Iijima; Shuichi Obuchi; Yoshinori Fujiwara; Hideyo Yoshida; Hisashi Kawai; Mariko Nishi; Hiroshi Murayama; Yu Taniguchi; Hidenori Amano; Ryutaro Takahashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Assessment of Body Composition in Health and Disease Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA): A Critical Overview.

Authors:  Maurizio Marra; Rosa Sammarco; Antonino De Lorenzo; Ferdinando Iellamo; Mario Siervo; Angelo Pietrobelli; Lorenzo Maria Donini; Lidia Santarpia; Mauro Cataldi; Fabrizio Pasanisi; Franco Contaldo
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Simplified morphological evaluation of skeletal muscle mass and maximum muscle strength in healthy young women: Comparison between thigh and calf.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yasuda
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.