Literature DB >> 11757067

Non-vital, prosthetic, and virtual reality models of microsurgical training.

D A Lannon1, J A Atkins, P E Butler.   

Abstract

Many microsurgical training models exist. These can be broadly classified into living and non-living. The latter type can be further sub-classified into non-vital, prosthetic, and virtual reality models. We review each model within these sub-groups with reference to the ideal properties of a training model. The most important attribute of any model is that the skills acquired from it must translate efficiently into microsurgical skill in the clinical situation. We believe that non-vital and prosthetic models are an important complement to living ones in training and maintaining the skills of all microsurgeons. As virtual reality technology improves, virtual models may succeed the rat as the microsurgical training tool of choice. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11757067     DOI: 10.1002/micr.21709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  13 in total

1.  Intracranial injectable tumor model: technical advancements.

Authors:  Cristian Gragnaniello; Filippo Gagliardi; Anthony M T Chau; Remi Nader; Alan Siu; Zachary Litvack; Bruno De Luca; Kevin Seex; Pietro Mortini; Anthony J Caputy; Ossama Al-Mefty
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2014-07-21

2.  High-Fidelity Microsurgical Simulation: The Thiel Cadaveric Nerve Model and Evaluation Instrument.

Authors:  Andrei Odobescu; Deborah Dawson; Isak Goodwin; Patrick G Harris; Joseph BouMerhi; Michel A Danino
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  A portable, low-cost practice model for microsurgical skills training.

Authors:  Henry D Greyner-Almeida; Ali Mahdavi Fard; Chi Chen; Jiwei Zhao; Sangita P Patel
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.029

4.  An efficient microvascular anastomosis training model based on chicken wings and simple instruments.

Authors:  Byeong Jin Kim; Sung-Tae Kim; Young-Gyun Jeong; Won-Hee Lee; Kun-Soo Lee; Sung-Hwa Paeng
Journal:  J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg       Date:  2013-03-31

5.  Evaluation of the microvascular research center training program for assessing microsurgical skills in trainee surgeons.

Authors:  Seiji Komatsu; Kiyoshi Yamada; Shuji Yamashita; Narushi Sugiyama; Eijiro Tokuyama; Kumiko Matsumoto; Ayumi Takara; Yoshihiro Kimata
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05-16

Review 6.  The rat model in microsurgery education: classical exercises and new horizons.

Authors:  Sandra Shurey; Yelena Akelina; Josette Legagneux; Gerardo Malzone; Lucian Jiga; Ali Mahmoud Ghanem
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-05-12

7.  High Fidelity Microsurgical Simulation: The Thiel Model and Evaluation Instrument.

Authors:  Andrei Odobescu; Isak Goodwin; Djamal Berbiche; Joseph BouMerhi; Patrick G Harris; Michel A Danino
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 0.947

8.  Towards a global understanding and standardisation of education and training in microsurgery.

Authors:  Clement Chi Ming Leung; Ali M Ghanem; Pierluigi Tos; Mihai Ionac; Stefan Froschauer; Simon R Myers
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2013-07-17

9.  The Chicken Thigh Adductor Profundus Free Muscle Flap: A Novel Validated Non-Living Microsurgery Simulation Training Model.

Authors:  Georgios Pafitanis; Yasmine Serrar; Maria Raveendran; Ali Ghanem; Simon Myers
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2017-07-15

Review 10.  Validating a Low-Fidelity Model for Microsurgical Anastomosis Training.

Authors:  Saeed Mohammad; Regina Hanstein; Yungtai Lo; I Martin Levy
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.