Literature DB >> 11756917

Endoscopic assessment of the "Z-line" (squamocolumnar junction) appearance: reproducibility of the ZAP classification among endoscopists.

Bengt Wallner1, Anders Sylvan, Karl-Gunnar Janunger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The histologic presence of intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus is a prerequisite for the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus. Thus, use of the term Barrett's esophagus to describe certain endoscopic features in the distal esophagus is inappropriate. There is no accepted classification system for the endoscopic description of the squamocolumnar mucosal junction, the so-called "Z-line." Furthermore, no clear definition of the normal Z-line exists. A classification of the Z-line appearance has been proposed: the ZAP classification. The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of this classification.
METHODS: Ten physicians with varying endoscopy experience were presented with 15 endoscopic photographs of the Z-line and were asked to classify them according to the ZAP classification. A second assessment was conducted between 7 and 15 weeks after the first.
RESULTS: The median kappa values were in the range of 0.72 to 0.90 with regard to intraobserver as well as interobserver reproducibility, irrespective of experience with upper endoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the ZAP classification is substantial and thus it is feasible to use this classification to characterize the appearance of the Z-line at endoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11756917     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.119876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  12 in total

1.  Feasibility, safety, acceptability, and yield of office-based, screening transnasal esophagoscopy (with video).

Authors:  Anne F Peery; Toshitaka Hoppo; Katherine S Garman; Evan S Dellon; Norma Daugherty; Susan Bream; Alejandro F Sanz; Jon Davison; Melissa Spacek; Diane Connors; Ashley L Faulx; Amitabh Chak; James D Luketich; Nicholas J Shaheen; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Inter-endoscopist agreement in diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Glen A Doherty; Danny G Cheriyan; Jan E Leyden; John F O'Dowd; Frank E Murray; Stephen E Patchett
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-03-20

3.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptom severity, proton pump inhibitor use, and esophageal carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Katie S Nason; Promporn Paula Wichienkuer; Omar Awais; Matthew J Schuchert; James D Luketich; Robert W O'Rourke; John G Hunter; Cynthia D Morris; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-07

4.  Population screening for barrett esophagus: a prospective randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Joseph Y Chang; Nicholas J Talley; G Richard Locke; David A Katzka; Cathy D Schleck; Alan R Zinsmeister; Kelly T Dunagan; Tsung-Teh Wu; Kenneth K Wang; Ganapathy A Prasad
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Capsule endoscopy examination--preliminary review by a nurse.

Authors:  Yaron Niv; Galia Niv
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  The integrity of esophagogastric junction anatomy in patients with isolated laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms.

Authors:  Kyle A Perry; C Kristian Enestvedt; Cedric S F Lorenzo; Paul Schipper; Joshua Schindler; Cynthia D Morris; Katie Nason; James D Luketich; John G Hunter; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  A cross-sectional analysis of the prevalence of Barrett esophagus in otolaryngology patients with laryngeal symptoms.

Authors:  Katie S Nason; Thomas Murphy; Joshua Schindler; Paul H Schipper; Toshitaka Hoppo; Brian S Diggs; David A Sauer; Nicholas J Shaheen; Cynthia D Morris; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  Endoscopically defined gastroesophageal junction coincides with the anatomical gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Bengt Wallner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparative acceptability of transnasal esophagoscopy and esophageal capsule esophagoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial in veterans.

Authors:  Amitabh Chak; Bronia M Alashkar; Gerard A Isenberg; Apoorva K Chandar; Katarina B Greer; Ashley Hepner; Richard D Pulice; Srikrishna Vemana; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Ashley L Faulx
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Clinical significance of hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Jong Jin Hyun; Young-Tae Bak
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.