Literature DB >> 11754497

Serial positron emission tomography scans following radiation therapy of patients with head and neck cancer.

K M Greven1, D W Williams, W F McGuirt, B A Harkness, R B D'Agostino, J W Keyes, N E Watson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A single institution study was undertaken to evaluate the role of positron emission tomography (PET) scans with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) prior to radiation and following radiation.
METHODS: Forty-five patients with head and neck cancers were evaluated with FDG-PET scans as well as either CT or MRI prior to treatment with definitive radiation (RT). These same scans were obtained following completion of RT at 1 month (36 patients), 4 months (28 patients), 12 months (19 patients), and 24 months (15 patients). Standard uptake values (SUV) normalized for blood glucose and lean body mass were calculated on the initial and 1-month post-treatment PET scans.
RESULTS: Fifteen patients are alive without evidence of disease at 24 to 52 months following RT. Initial SUVs were calculated on the primary tumor site and ranged from 2.5 to 28.5. These values did not have any correlation with local control when examined for the entire group, primary site, or T stage. One-month post-RT SUV ranged from 1.8 to 6.24. Of the 36 1-month post-RT PET scans, six were interpreted as positive for residual disease and were confirmed by biopsy. Four of the five scans, which were interpreted as equivocal, were positive on biopsy. Seven of the 25 scans, which were interpreted as negative for tumor, were positive on biopsy. Four-month scans were more accurate for disease with disease noted in 0 of 18 negative scans, 6 of 7 positive scans, and 2 of 3 equivocal scans.
CONCLUSIONS: PET is useful for initial imaging of head and neck cancers. SUV does not appear to be useful for predicting outcome following treatment with RT. One-month post-RT scans were inaccurate for predicting the presence of cancer. Four-month post-RT scans were a better predictor for the presence of cancer. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 23: 942-946, 2001.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11754497     DOI: 10.1002/hed.1136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  51 in total

1.  Detecting recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy: room for improvement.

Authors:  Jolijn Brouwer; Evelien J Bodar; Remco De Bree; Johannes A Langendijk; Jonas A Castelijns; Otto S Hoekstra; C René Leemans
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Postradiation metabolic tumor volume predicts outcome in head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  James D Murphy; Trang H La; Karen Chu; Andrew Quon; Nancy J Fischbein; Peter G Maxim; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Opportunities and challenges facing biomarker development for personalized head and neck cancer treatment.

Authors:  Alexandra Lucs; Benjamin Saltman; Christine H Chung; Bettie M Steinberg; David L Schwartz
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 4.  Functional imaging in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  David I Kutler; Richard J Wong; Dennis H Kraus
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tejpal Gupta; Zubin Master; Sadhana Kannan; Jai Prakash Agarwal; Sarbani Ghsoh-Laskar; Venkatesh Rangarajan; Vedang Murthy; Ashwini Budrukkar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Long-term regional control in the observed neck following definitive chemoradiation for node-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Anuj Goenka; Luc G T Morris; Shyam S Rao; Suzanne L Wolden; Richard J Wong; Dennis H Kraus; Nisha Ohri; Jeremy Setton; Benjamin H Lok; Nadeem Riaz; Borys R Mychalczak; Heiko Schoder; Ian Ganly; Jatin P Shah; David G Pfister; Michael J Zelefsky; Nancy Y Lee
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 7.  Glucose deprivation-induced metabolic oxidative stress and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Andrean L Simons; David M Mattson; Ken Dornfeld; Douglas R Spitz
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.805

8.  Early assessment of radiation response using a novel functional imaging modality -- [18F]fluorocholine PET (FCH-PET): a pilot study.

Authors:  Bhupesh Parashar; A Gabriella Wernicke; Samuel Rice; Joseph Osborne; Prabhsimranjot Singh; Dattatreyudu Nori; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Stanley Goldsmith; K S Clifford Chao
Journal:  Discov Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.970

9.  Clinical Applications of FDG PET and PET/CT in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Akram Al-Ibraheem; Andreas Buck; Bernd Joachim Krause; Klemens Scheidhauer; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  The cost-effectiveness of 18FDG-PET in selecting patients with suspicion of recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy for direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Addy C G van Hooren; Jolijn Brouwer; Remco de Bree; Otto S Hoekstra; C René Leemans; Carin A Uyl-de Groot
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.