Literature DB >> 11753018

Comparison of Amsorb, sodalime, and Baralyme degradation of volatile anesthetics and formation of carbon monoxide and compound a in swine in vivo.

Evan D Kharasch1, Karen M Powers, Alan A Artru.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Consequences of volatile anesthetic degradation by carbon dioxide absorbents that contain strong base include formation of compound A from sevoflurane, formation of carbon monoxide (CO) and CO toxicity from desflurane, enflurane and isoflurane, delayed inhalation induction, and increased anesthetic costs. Amsorb (Armstrong Ltd., Coleraine, Northern Ireland) is a new absorbent that does not contain strong base and does not form CO or compound A in vitro. This investigation compared Amsorb, Baralyme (Chemetron Medical Division, Allied Healthcare Products, St. Louis, MO), and sodalime effects on CO (from desflurane and isoflurane) and compound A formation, carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) concentrations, and anesthetic degradation in a clinically relevant porcine in vivo model.
METHODS: Pigs were anesthetized with desflurane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane, using fresh or partially dehydrated Amsorb, Baralyme, and new and old formulations of sodalime. Anesthetic concentrations in the fresh (preabsorber), inspired (postabsorber), and end-tidal gas were measured, as were inspired CO and compound A concentrations and blood oxyhemoglobin and COHb concentrations.
RESULTS: For desflurane and isoflurane, the order of inspired CO and COHb formation was dehydrated Baralyme >> soda-lime > Amsorb. For desflurane and Baralyme, peak CO was 9,700 +/- 5,100 parts per million (ppm), and the increase in COHb was 37 +/- 14%. CO and COHb increases were undetectable with Amsorb. Oxyhemoglobin desaturation occurred with desflurane and Baralyme but not Amsorb or sodalime. The gap between inspired and end-tidal desflurane and isoflurane did not differ between the various dehydrated absorbents. Neither fresh nor dehydrated Amsorb caused compound A formation from sevoflurane. In contrast, Baralyme and sodalime caused 20-40 ppm compound A. The gap between inspired and end-tidal sevoflurane did not differ between fresh absorbents, but was Amsorb < sodalime < Baralyme with dehydrated absorbents.
CONCLUSION: Amsorb caused minimal if any CO formation, minimal compound A formation regardless of absorbent hydration, and the least amount of sevoflurane degradation. An absorbent like Amsorb, which does not contain strong base or cause anesthetic degradation and formation of toxic products, may have benefit with respect to patient safety, inhalation induction, and anesthetic consumption (cost).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11753018     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200201000-00031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  7 in total

Review 1.  Inhaled anesthetics in horses.

Authors:  Robert J Brosnan
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 1.792

2.  Important role of calcium chloride in preventing carbon monoxide generation during desflurane degradation with alkali hydroxide-free carbon dioxide absorbents.

Authors:  Takahiro Ando; Atsushi Mori; Rie Ito; Kimitoshi Nishiwaki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Comparison of the renal safety between carbon dioxide absorbent products under sevoflurane anesthesia: a pilot study.

Authors:  Hyung-Chul Lee; Donguk Kim; Wonsik Ahn; Jiyeon Sim; Yehoon Chung
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-07-24

4.  Performance of a new carbon dioxide absorbent, Yabashi lime® as compared to conventional carbon dioxide absorbent during sevoflurane anesthesia in dogs.

Authors:  Kei Kondoh; Ayman Atiba; Kiyoshi Nagase; Shizuko Ogawa; Takashi Miwa; Teruya Katsumata; Hiroshi Ueno; Yuji Uzuka
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 1.267

Review 5.  Nature's marvels endowed in gaseous molecules I: Carbon monoxide and its physiological and therapeutic roles.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Yang; Wen Lu; Christopher P Hopper; Bowen Ke; Binghe Wang
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 11.413

Review 6.  The modern integrated anaesthesia workstation.

Authors:  Vijaya P Patil; Madhavi G Shetmahajan; Jigeeshu V Divatia
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-09

Review 7.  The closed circuit and the low flow systems.

Authors:  S Parthasarathy
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.