Literature DB >> 11752495

Clinical assessment.

James M Wood1, Howard N Garb, Scott O Lilienfeld, M Teresa Nezworski.   

Abstract

Are clinical psychologists' assessment practices cost-effective? Are they scientifically sound? Are they fair and unbiased? Financial pressures from managed care interests, recent developments in the law, and multicultural issues are forcing the profession to confront these hard questions regarding accountability. Our review discusses the important changes that have begun to alter the field of personality assessment and describes recent research on clinical judgment and its implications for the future. We conclude that clinical psychology can adapt to future conditions by developing assessment strategies that are economical, scientifically sound, and culturally sensitive.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11752495     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol        ISSN: 0066-4308            Impact factor:   24.137


  8 in total

1.  CORR Insights ®: Patients with greater symptom intensity and more disability are more likely to be surprised by a hand surgeon's advice.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ouellette
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Assessment of clinical information: Comparison of the validity of a Structured Clinical Interview (the SCID) and the Clinical Diagnostic Interview.

Authors:  Rebecca Drill; Ora Nakash; Jared A DeFife; Drew Westen
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.254

3.  Predicting Therapeutic Effects of Psychodiagnostic Assessment Among Children and Adolescents Participating in Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Andrea S Young; Molly R Meers; Anthony T Vesco; Adina M Seidenfeld; L Eugene Arnold; Mary A Fristad
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2016-04-22

4.  A decision-tree approach to the assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder: Engineering empirically rigorous and ecologically valid assessment measures.

Authors:  Regan W Stewart; Peter W Tuerk; Isha W Metzger; Tatiana M Davidson; John Young
Journal:  Psychol Serv       Date:  2015-12-14

5.  Patient initiation of information: exploring its role during the mental health intake visit.

Authors:  Ora Nakash; Sarah Dargouth; Vanessa Oddo; Shan Gao; Margarita Alegría
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-12-04

6.  Predicting Personality and Psychological Distress Using Natural Language Processing: A Study Protocol.

Authors:  Jihee Jang; Seowon Yoon; Gaeun Son; Minjung Kang; Joon Yeon Choeh; Kee-Hong Choi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-07

7.  The five-year costs and benefits of extended psychological and psychiatric assessment versus standard intake interview for women with comorbid substance use disorders treated in compulsory care in Sweden.

Authors:  Tina M Olsson; Mats Fridell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Clinicians' attitudes toward standardized assessment and diagnosis within child and adolescent psychiatry.

Authors:  M Danielson; A Månsdotter; E Fransson; S Dalsgaard; J-O Larsson
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.033

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.