Literature DB >> 11751742

Comparative effects of ramipril on ambulatory and office blood pressures: a HOPE Substudy.

P Svensson1, U de Faire, P Sleight, S Yusuf, J Ostergren.   

Abstract

In the HOPE-trial, the ACE inhibitor ramipril significantly reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. The benefit could only partly be attributed to the modest mean reduction of office blood pressure (OBP) during the study period (3/2 mm Hg). However, because according to the HOPE protocol ramipril was given once daily at bedtime and blood pressure was measured during the day, the 24-hour reduction of blood pressure may be underestimated based on OBP. Thirty-eight patients with peripheral arterial disease enrolled in the HOPE study underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) measurement before randomization and after 1 year. OBP was measured in the sitting position immediately before fitting the ABP measuring equipment to the patients. Ramipril did not significantly reduce OBP (8/2 mm Hg, P=NS) or day ABP (6/2 mm Hg, P=NS) after 1 year. Twenty-four-hour ABP was significantly reduced (10/4 mm Hg, P=0.03), mainly because of a more pronounced blood pressure lowering effect during nighttime (17/8 mm Hg, P<0.001). The night/day ratio was also significantly lowered in the ramipril group. ABP shows greater falls, especially at night, than OBP during treatment with ramipril given once daily at bedtime. Although, OBP is the correct comparator when comparing with previous large intervention trials and epidemiological studies, the effects on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality seen with ramipril in the HOPE study may, to a larger extent than previously ascribed, relate to effects on blood pressure patterns over the 24-hour period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11751742     DOI: 10.1161/hy1101.099502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  97 in total

Review 1.  Blood pressure-independent impact of antihypertensive agents on cardiovascular and renal disease.

Authors:  Debasish Banerjee; Barry J Materson
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Preventing stroke with ramipril. Results should have been presented in ways that help practising clinicians.

Authors:  P Badrinath
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-24

Review 3.  A rational basis for selection among drugs of the same class.

Authors:  Morris J Brown
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Best bang for the buck?

Authors:  Alan B Weder
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Ongoing trials: what should we expect after ALLHAT?

Authors:  Ji-Guang Wang; Jan A Staessen; Anthony M Heagerty
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 6.  Microalbuminuria and diabetic cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Richard J MacIsaac; Mark E Cooper
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.113

7.  Conundrum of the HOPE study: time of taking ramipril may account for lack of relation between blood pressure and outcome.

Authors:  Roy Taylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-20

Review 8.  Protection against stroke and dementia: an update on the latest clinical trial evidence.

Authors:  Bryan Williams
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.369

9.  Clinical trials report. Adverse prognostic significance of new diabetes in treated hypertensive subjects.

Authors:  Matthew R Weir
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 10.  Are there benefits of antihypertensive therapy beyond blood pressure lowering?

Authors:  Joseph L Izzo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.