Literature DB >> 11751367

"Unwarranted survivals" and "anomalous deaths" from coronary heart disease: prospective survey of general population.

A McConnachie1, K Hunt, C Emslie, C Hart, G Watt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess survival in people who are at apparent high risk who do not develop coronary heart disease ("unwarranted survivals") and mortality in people at low risk who die from the disease ("anomalous deaths") and the extent to which these outcomes are explained by other, less visible, risk factors.
DESIGN: Prospective general population survey.
SETTING: Renfrew and Paisley, Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 6068 men aged 45-64 years at screening in 1972-6, allocated to "visible" risk groups on the basis of body mass index and smoking. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival and death from coronary heart disease by age 70 years.
RESULTS: Visible risk was a good predictor of mortality: 13% (45) of men at low risk and 45% (86) of men at high risk had died by age 70 years. Of these deaths, 12 (4%) and 44 (23%), respectively, were from coronary heart disease. In the group at low visible risk other less visible risk factors accounted for increased risk in 83% (10/12) of men who died from coronary heart disease and 29% (84/292) of men who survived. In the high risk group 81/107 who survived (76%) and 19/44 (43%) who died from coronary heart disease had lower risk after other factors were considered. Different risk factors modified risk (beyond smoking and body mass index) in the two groups. Among men at low visible risk, poor respiratory function, diabetes, previous coronary heart disease, and socioeconomic deprivation modified risk. Among men at high visible risk, height and cholesterol concentration modified risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in survival between these extreme risk groups are dramatic. Health promotion messages would be more credible if they discussed anomalies and the limits of prediction of coronary disease at an individual level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11751367      PMCID: PMC61054          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7327.1487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  10 in total

1.  Commentary: the prevention paradox in lay epidemiology--Rose revisited.

Authors:  K Hunt; C Emslie
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  The limits of lifestyle: re-assessing 'fatalism' in the popular culture of illness prevention.

Authors:  C Davison; S Frankel; G D Smith
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Lay constructions of a family history of heart disease: potential for misunderstandings in the clinical encounter?

Authors:  K Hunt; C Emslie; G Watt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-04-14       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Lay epidemiology and the rationality of responses to health education.

Authors:  S Frankel; C Davison; G D Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of multiple risk factor interventions for preventing coronary heart disease.

Authors:  S Ebrahim; G D Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-06-07

6.  Sick individuals and sick populations.

Authors:  G Rose
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Self-administration of a questionnaire on chest pain and intermittent claudication.

Authors:  G Rose; P McCartney; D D Reid
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1977-03

8.  Impaired lung function and mortality risk in men and women: findings from the Renfrew and Paisley prospective population study.

Authors:  D J Hole; G C Watt; G Davey-Smith; C L Hart; C R Gillis; V M Hawthorne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

9.  Cardiorespiratory disease in men and women in urban Scotland: baseline characteristics of the Renfrew/Paisley (midspan) study population.

Authors:  V M Hawthorne; G C Watt; C L Hart; D J Hole; G D Smith; C R Gillis
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 0.729

10.  Readiness for lifestyle advice: self-assessments of coronary risk prior to screening in the British family heart study. Family Heart Study Group.

Authors:  T M Marteau; A L Kinmonth; S Pyke; S G Thompson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.386

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  The medicalisation of old age.

Authors:  Shah Ebrahim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-13

2.  William Pickles lecture. General practice and the epidemiology of health and disease in families.

Authors:  Graham Watt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  How should public health professionals engage with lay epidemiology?

Authors:  P Allmark; A Tod
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  'Coming down the line'-- patients' understanding of their family history of common chronic disease.

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Jon Emery
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Response to written feedback of clinical data within a longitudinal study: a qualitative study exploring the ethical implications.

Authors:  Karen Lorimer; Cindy M Gray; Kate Hunt; Sally Wyke; Annie Anderson; Michaela Benzeval
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Patient and practitioner views on cancer risk discussions in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  David N Blane; Sara MacDonald; Catherine A O'Donnell
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2022-03-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.