OBJECTIVE: To test whether rhythmic formulas such as the rosary and yoga mantras can synchronise and reinforce inherent cardiovascular rhythms and modify baroreflex sensitivity. DESIGN: Comparison of effects of recitation of the Ave Maria (in Latin) or of a mantra, during spontaneous and metronome controlled breathing, on breathing rate and on spontaneous oscillations in RR interval, and on blood pressure and cerebral circulation. SETTING: Florence and Pavia, Italy. PARTICIPANTS: 23 healthy adults. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Breathing rate, regularity of breathing, baroreflex sensitivity, frequency of cardiovascular oscillations. RESULTS: Both prayer and mantra caused striking, powerful, and synchronous increases in existing cardiovascular rhythms when recited six times a minute. Baroreflex sensitivity also increased significantly, from 9.5 (SD 4.6) to 11.5 (4.9) ms/mm Hg, P<0.05. CONCLUSION: Rhythm formulas that involve breathing at six breaths per minute induce favourable psychological and possibly physiological effects.
OBJECTIVE: To test whether rhythmic formulas such as the rosary and yoga mantras can synchronise and reinforce inherent cardiovascular rhythms and modify baroreflex sensitivity. DESIGN: Comparison of effects of recitation of the Ave Maria (in Latin) or of a mantra, during spontaneous and metronome controlled breathing, on breathing rate and on spontaneous oscillations in RR interval, and on blood pressure and cerebral circulation. SETTING: Florence and Pavia, Italy. PARTICIPANTS: 23 healthy adults. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Breathing rate, regularity of breathing, baroreflex sensitivity, frequency of cardiovascular oscillations. RESULTS: Both prayer and mantra caused striking, powerful, and synchronous increases in existing cardiovascular rhythms when recited six times a minute. Baroreflex sensitivity also increased significantly, from 9.5 (SD 4.6) to 11.5 (4.9) ms/mm Hg, P<0.05. CONCLUSION: Rhythm formulas that involve breathing at six breaths per minute induce favourable psychological and possibly physiological effects.
Authors: L Bernardi; J Wdowczyk-Szulc; C Valenti; S Castoldi; C Passino; G Spadacini; P Sleight Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: M Piepoli; P Sleight; S Leuzzi; F Valle; G Spadacini; C Passino; J Johnston; L Bernardi Journal: Circulation Date: 1997-04-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J Nolan; P D Batin; R Andrews; S J Lindsay; P Brooksby; M Mullen; W Baig; A D Flapan; A Cowley; R J Prescott; J M Neilson; K A Fox Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-10-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: P Sleight; M T La Rovere; A Mortara; G Pinna; R Maestri; S Leuzzi; B Bianchini; L Tavazzi; L Bernardi Journal: Clin Sci (Lond) Date: 1995-01 Impact factor: 6.124
Authors: Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser; Lisa M Christian; Rebecca Andridge; Beom Seuk Hwang; William B Malarkey; Martha A Belury; Charles F Emery; Ronald Glaser Journal: Physiol Behav Date: 2012-01-27
Authors: Jill E Bormann; Allen L Gifford; Martha Shively; Tom L Smith; Laura Redwine; Ann Kelly; Sheryl Becker; Madeline Gershwin; Patricia Bone; Wendy Belding Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2006-07-18
Authors: Autumn M Gallegos; Michael Hoerger; Nancy L Talbot; Michael S Krasner; Jennifer M Knight; Jan A Moynihan; Paul R Duberstein Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 2.579