Literature DB >> 11751321

Salt-induced conformation and interaction changes of nucleosome core particles.

Stéphanie Mangenot1, Amélie Leforestier, Patrice Vachette, Dominique Durand, Françoise Livolant.   

Abstract

Small angle x-ray scattering was used to follow changes in the conformation and interactions of nucleosome core particles (NCP) as a function of the monovalent salt concentration C(s). The maximal extension (D(max)) of the NCP (145 +/- 3-bp DNA) increases from 137 +/- 5 A to 165 +/- 5 A when C(s) rises from 10 to 50 mM and remains constant with further increases of C(s) up to 200 mM. In view of the very weak increase of the R(g) value in the same C(s) range, we attribute this D(max) variation to tail extension, a proposal confirmed by simulations of the entire I(q) curves, considering an ideal solution of particles with tails either condensed or extended. This tail extension is observed at higher salt values when particles contain longer DNA fragments (165 +/- 10 bp). The maximal extension of the tails always coincides with the screening of repulsive interactions between particles. The second virial coefficient becomes smaller than the hard sphere virial coefficient and eventually becomes negative (net attractive interactions) for NCP(145). Addition of salt simultaneously screens Coulombic repulsive interactions between NCP and Coulombic attractive interactions between tails and DNA inside the NCP. We discuss how the coupling of these two phenomena may be of biological relevance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11751321      PMCID: PMC1302474          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75399-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  36 in total

Review 1.  Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the eukaryote chromosome.

Authors:  R D Kornberg; Y Lorch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Persistent interactions of core histone tails with nucleosomal DNA following acetylation and transcription factor binding.

Authors:  V Mutskov; D Gerber; D Angelov; J Ausio; J Workman; S Dimitrov
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  The nucleosomal array: structure/function relationships.

Authors:  T M Fletcher; J C Hansen
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.807

Review 4.  The histone tails of the nucleosome.

Authors:  K Luger; T J Richmond
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  Nucleosome dynamics. III. Histone tail-dependent fluctuation of nucleosomes between open and closed DNA conformations. Implications for chromatin dynamics and the linking number paradox. A relaxation study of mononucleosomes on DNA minicircles.

Authors:  F De Lucia; M Alilat; A Sivolob; A Prunell
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-01-22       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  The N tails of histones H3 and H4 adopt a highly structured conformation in the nucleosome.

Authors:  J L Banères; A Martin; J Parello
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-31       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Liquid crystalline ordering of nucleosome core particles under macromolecular crowding conditions: evidence for a discotic columnar hexagonal phase.

Authors:  A Leforestier; F Livolant
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution.

Authors:  K Luger; A W Mäder; R K Richmond; D F Sargent; T J Richmond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Core histone tail domains mediate oligonucleosome folding and nucleosomal DNA organization through distinct molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  T M Fletcher; J C Hansen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-10-27       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Natural abundance carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance studies of histone and DNA dynamics in nucleosome cores.

Authors:  P R Hilliard; R M Smith; R L Rill
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1986-05-05       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  40 in total

1.  X-ray diffraction characterization of the dense phases formed by nucleosome core particles.

Authors:  Stéphanie Mangenot; Amélie Leforestier; Dominique Durand; Françoise Livolant
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  SAXS study of the PIR domain from the Grb14 molecular adaptor: a natively unfolded protein with a transient structure primer?

Authors:  K Moncoq; I Broutin; C T Craescu; P Vachette; A Ducruix; D Durand
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Charge state of the globular histone core controls stability of the nucleosome.

Authors:  Andrew T Fenley; David A Adams; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Electrostatic interactions between arginines and the minor groove in the nucleosome.

Authors:  Sean M West; Remo Rohs; Richard S Mann; Barry Honig
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  2010-06

Review 5.  New insights into nucleosome and chromatin structure: an ordered state or a disordered affair?

Authors:  Karolin Luger; Mekonnen L Dechassa; David J Tremethick
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  Electrostatic mechanism of nucleosomal array folding revealed by computer simulation.

Authors:  Jian Sun; Qing Zhang; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  EGFP-tagged core and linker histones diffuse via distinct mechanisms within living cells.

Authors:  Dipanjan Bhattacharya; Aprotim Mazumder; S Annie Miriam; G V Shivashankar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Computer modeling demonstrates that electrostatic attraction of nucleosomal DNA is mediated by histone tails.

Authors:  Nikolay Korolev; Alexander P Lyubartsev; Lars Nordenskiöld
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Multiscale modeling of nucleosome dynamics.

Authors:  Shantanu Sharma; Feng Ding; Nikolay V Dokholyan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  CENP-A arrays are more condensed than canonical arrays at low ionic strength.

Authors:  Christian P Geiss; Dimitra Keramisanou; Nikolina Sekulic; Margot P Scheffer; Ben E Black; Achilleas S Frangakis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.