Literature DB >> 11751225

Minimum conflict: a divide-and-conquer approach to phylogeny estimation.

G Fuellen1, J W Wägele, R Giegerich.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Fast and reliable phylogeny estimation is rapidly gaining importance as more and more genomic sequence information is becoming available, and the study of the evolution of genes and genomes accelerates our understanding in biology and medicine alike. Branch attraction phenomena due to unequal amounts of evolutionary change in different parts of the phylogeny are one major problem for current methods, placing the species that evolved fast in one part of the phylogenetic tree, and the species that evolved slowly in the other.
RESULTS: We describe a way to avoid the artifactual attraction of species that evolved slowly, by detecting shared old character states using a calibrated comparison with an outgroup. The corresponding focus on shared novel character states yields a fast and transparent phylogeny estimation algorithm, by application of the divide-and-conquer principle, and heuristic search: shared novelties give evidence of the exclusive common heritage (monophyly) of a subset of the species. They indicate conflict in a split of all species considered, if the split tears them apart. Only the split at the root of the phylogenetic tree cannot have such conflict. Therefore, we can work top-down, from the root to the leaves, by heuristically searching for a minimum-conflict split, and tackling the resulting two subsets in the same way. The algorithm, called "minimum conflict phylogeny estimation" (MCOPE), has been validated successfully using both natural and artificial data. In particular, we reanalyze published trees, yielding more plausible phylogenies, and we analyze small "undisputed" trees on the basis of alignments considering structural homology. AVAILABILITY: MCOPEis available via http://bibiserv.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mcope/. CONTACT: fuellen@alum.mit.edu

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11751225     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  5 in total

Review 1.  Homology and phylogeny and their automated inference.

Authors:  Georg Fuellen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-02-21

2.  Can quartet analyses combining maximum likelihood estimation and Hennigian logic overcome long branch attraction in phylogenomic sequence data?

Authors:  Patrick Kück; Mark Wilkinson; Christian Groß; Peter G Foster; Johann W Wägele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Simplifying gene trees for easier comprehension.

Authors:  Paul-Ludwig Lott; Marvin Mundry; Christoph Sassenberg; Stefan Lorkowski; Georg Fuellen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  The origin of modern frogs (Neobatrachia) was accompanied by acceleration in mitochondrial and nuclear substitution rates.

Authors:  Iker Irisarri; Diego San Mauro; Federico Abascal; Annemarie Ohler; Miguel Vences; Rafael Zardoya
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Visualizing differences in phylogenetic information content of alignments and distinction of three classes of long-branch effects.

Authors:  Johann Wolfgang Wägele; Christoph Mayer
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 3.260

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.