Literature DB >> 11750962

Temporal and geographical variation in UK obstetricians' personal preference regarding mode of delivery.

Katie M Groom1, Sara Paterson-Brown, Nicholas M Fisk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess UK obstetricians' preferences about mode of delivery for themselves or their partners and determine whether these changed since 1995. STUDY
DESIGN: All 313 registered obstetricians in London and one in five (279) sample of those outside London were sent a structured anonymous postal questionnaire.
RESULTS: The response rate was 54%. In a hypothetical uncomplicated first singleton pregnancy with a cephalic presentation at term, 15% chose elective caesarean section (CS) (17% in London versus 13% outside London). The overall rate for London has not changed since 1995 (17 versus 17%), although the difference between women and men was less (31 versus 8% in 1995 and 21 versus 14% in 1999, respectively). The number choosing elective CS increased with estimated foetal weight > 4.0kg (40%) and > 4.5kg (65%) and with breech presentation both in a first pregnancy (69%) and after a previous vaginal delivery (49%).
CONCLUSION: The overall attitude of London obstetricians to mode of delivery for themselves or their partners has not changed since 1995 and is similar to those of UK obstetricians elsewhere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11750962     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00468-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  The effect of mode of delivery on postpartum sexual functioning in primiparous women.

Authors:  Fatemeh Dabiri; Asieh Pormehr Yabandeh; Arefeh Shahi; Azita Kamjoo; Saeed Hosseini Teshnizi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2014-07

2.  The choice of elective cesarean delivery in obstetrics: a voluntary survey of Canadian health care professionals.

Authors:  Scott A Farrell; Thomas F Baskett; Karen D Farrell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-06-24

3.  Labor and Delivery Experiences of Mothers with Suspected Large Babies.

Authors:  Erika R Cheng; Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Naomi E Stotland; Ronald E Iverson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-12

4.  Medical students' personal choice for mode of delivery in Santa Catarina, Brazil: a cross-sectional, quantitative study.

Authors:  Tatiane Watanabe; Roxana Knobel; Guilherme Suchard; Mario Julio Franco; Eleonora d'Orsi; Elenice Bertanha Consonni; Marcos Consonni
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Private health care coverage and increased risk of obstetric intervention.

Authors:  Jennifer E Lutomski; Michael Murphy; Declan Devane; Sarah Meaney; Richard A Greene
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Developing and pre-testing a decision board to facilitate informed choice about delivery approach in uncomplicated pregnancy.

Authors:  Jill Milne; Amiram Gafni; Diane Lu; Stephen Wood; Reg Sauve; Sue Ross
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.