Literature DB >> 11749709

Parasites and supernormal manipulation.

Ø H Holen1, G P Saetre, T Slagsvold, N C Stenseth.   

Abstract

Social parasites may exploit their hosts by mimicking other organisms that the hosts normally benefit from investing in or responding to in some other way. Some parasites exaggerate key characters of the organisms they mimic, possibly in order to increase the response from the hosts. The huge gape and extreme begging intensity of the parasitic common cuckoo chick (Cuculus canorus) may be an example. In this paper, the evolutionary stability of manipulating hosts through exaggerated signals is analysed using game theory. Our model indicates that a parasite's signal intensity must be below a certain threshold in order to ensure acceptance and that this threshold depends directly on the rate of parasitism. The only evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) combination is when hosts accept all signallers and parasites signal at their optimal signal intensity, which must be below the threshold. Supernormal manipulation by parasites is only evolutionarily stable under sufficiently low rates of parasitism. If the conditions for the ESS combination are not satisfied, rejector hosts can invade using signal intensity as a cue for identifying parasites. These qualitative predictions are discussed with respect to empirical evidence from parasitic mimicry systems that have been suggested to involve supernormal signalling, including evicting avian brood parasites and insect-mimicking Ophrys orchids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11749709      PMCID: PMC1088914          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  3 in total

1.  Females are responsible for ejection of cuckoo eggs in the rufous bush robin.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Arms races between and within species.

Authors:  R Dawkins; J R Krebs
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21

3.  How selfish is a cuckoo chick?

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.844

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  How an orchid harms its pollinator.

Authors:  Bob B M Wong; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host.

Authors:  Tomás Grim
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Rearing a virulent common cuckoo is not extra costly for its only cavity-nesting host.

Authors:  Peter Samaš; Jarkko Rutila; Marcel Honza; Michal Kysučan; Tomáš Grim
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Nestling discrimination without recognition: a possible defence mechanism for hosts towards cuckoo parasitism?

Authors:  Tomás Grim; Oddmund Kleven; Oldrich Mikulica
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.