Literature DB >> 11749674

Is resting metabolic rate different between men and women?

A C Buchholz1, M Rafii, P B Pencharz.   

Abstract

A low resting metabolic rate (RMR) has been proposed as a possible cause for the increased body fat commonly seen in women compared with men. Absolute RMR is higher in men, but whether RMR adjusted for lean body mass (LBM) remains higher is unresolved. The objective of the present study was to determine whether RMR adjusted for various body composition factors differed between healthy adult men and women. Thirty men years, BMI and twenty-eight women years, BMI were included in the analyses. RMR was measured by open-circuit indirect calorimetry for 60 min. Extracellular water (ECW) was measured by corrected Br(-) space and total body water (TBW) by 2H dilution. LBM was estimated as TBW/0.732. Intracellular water (ICW) was calculated as TBW-ECW, and body cell mass (BCM) as ICW/0.732. Men were heavier and had higher BMI, LBM, BCM and ECW, but less fat mass. Absolute RMR was higher in men than women v. P<0.0001). This difference became non-significant when RMR was adjusted for LBM by ANCOVA v. P=0.2191), but remained significant when adjusted for BCM v. P=0.0249). Fat mass explained a significant amount of variation in RMR in women (r(2) 0.28, P=0.0038), but not in men (r(2) 0.03, P=0.3301). The relationships between body fat and the various subcompartments of BCM and RMR require further elucidation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11749674     DOI: 10.1079/bjn2001471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  19 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian hormones and obesity.

Authors:  Brigitte Leeners; Nori Geary; Philippe N Tobler; Lori Asarian
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 15.610

2.  Body Composition Assessment and Nutritional Status Evaluation in Men and Women Portuguese Centenarians.

Authors:  A Pereira da Silva; A Matos; A Valente; Â Gil; I Alonso; R Ribeiro; M Bicho; J Gorjão-Clara
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Lean Flow: Optimizing Cardiopulmonary Bypass Equipment and Flow for Obese Patients-A Technique Article.

Authors:  Joshua M Blessing; Jeffrey B Riley
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2017-03

4.  Energy expenditure in people with motor-complete paraplegia.

Authors:  T Holmlund; E Ekblom-Bak; E Franzén; C Hultling; L Nilsson Wikmar; K Wahman
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  A Bayesian Approach for Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Pegylated Interferon α-2a in Hepatitis C Patients.

Authors:  Mohammad I Saleh
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Gender-specific differences in energy metabolism during the initial phase of critical illness.

Authors:  A Drolz; M Wewalka; T Horvatits; V Fuhrmann; B Schneeweiss; M Trauner; C Zauner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Resting energy expenditure: a stronger marker than body weight for bone mineral density in white women but not men? The Rancho Bernardo study.

Authors:  Afrooz Afghani; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.638

8.  PRL2 links magnesium flux and sex-dependent circadian metabolic rhythms.

Authors:  Noriko Uetani; Serge Hardy; Simon-Pierre Gravel; Silke Kiessling; Adam Pietrobon; Nau Nau Wong; Valérie Chénard; Nicolas Cermakian; Julie St-Pierre; Michel L Tremblay
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-07-06

9.  The scaling of human basal and resting metabolic rates.

Authors:  Heather M Bowes; Catriona A Burdon; Nigel A S Taylor
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Resting metabolic rate and its adjustments as predictors of risk protein-energy wasting in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Jingjing Da; Yanjun Long; Qian Li; Xia Yang; Jing Yuan; Yan Zha
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.