Literature DB >> 11749109

MRI of the brain is safe in patients implanted with the vagus nerve stimulator.

S R Benbadis1, J Nyhenhuis, W O Tatum, F R Murtagh, M Gieron, F L Vale.   

Abstract

Metallic devices generally represent a contra-indication for MRI scanning. Based on laboratory testing, the neuro cybernetic prosthesis (NCP) is labelled MRI compatible when used with a send and receive head coil. However, there are no published clinical data to support the safety of brain MRI in patients with the NCP. Our objective was to report clinical experience with such a population. We questioned 40 centres that had implanted the NCP system as of 10/1/99. If MRI had been performed on any vagus nerve stimulator patients, we collected information on these patients, the MRI technique used, any events noted during the scan, including both subjective reports (by the patient ), and observable (objective) changes noted by the staff. Twelve centres (30%) responded. Over a time period of 3 years, there were a total of 27 MRI scans performed in 25 patients. All scanners were 1.5 T. A head coil was used in 26 scans, and a body coil in one. The indications for the scans were diverse. Seven were related to the epilepsy, including aetiology or pre-surgical evaluation. Others were unrelated, including brain tumours, cerebral haematoma, vasculitis, headaches, and head trauma. Three scans were performed with the stimulator on, while 24 were performed with the stimulator off. One patient had a mild objective voice change for several minutes. No other objective changes were noted in any of the patients. One 11-year old reported chest pain while experiencing severe claustrophobia. Twenty-five patients denied any discomfort around the lead or the generator. We conclude that this clinical series supports the safety of routine brain MRI using a send and receive head coil in patients implanted with the NCP System. Copyright 2001 BEA Trading Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11749109     DOI: 10.1053/seiz.2001.0540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Seizure        ISSN: 1059-1311            Impact factor:   3.184


  5 in total

1.  Revision of vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) electrodes: review and report on use of ultra-sharp monopolar tip.

Authors:  Wai Hoe Ng; Elizabeth Donner; Cristina Go; Amal Abou-Hamden; James T Rutka
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Tumor-Related Epilepsy: Does It Make Sense?

Authors:  Keng Lam; Jane Y Hwang
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2021-06-09

3.  Vagus nerve stimulation to augment recovery from severe traumatic brain injury impeding consciousness: a prospective pilot clinical trial.

Authors:  Chen Shi; Steven R Flanagan; Uzma Samadani
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.448

Review 4.  Electrical stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy.

Authors:  Paul Boon; Robrecht Raedt; Veerle de Herdt; Tine Wyckhuys; Kristl Vonck
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.620

5.  Tx/Rx Head Coil Induces Less RF Transmit-Related Heating than Body Coil in Conductive Metallic Objects Outside the Active Area of the Head Coil.

Authors:  Zoltan Nagy; Aaron Oliver-Taylor; Andre Kuehne; Sigrun Goluch; Nikolaus Weiskopf
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 4.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.