Literature DB >> 11749101

Effectiveness of telephone counseling for mammography: results from five randomized trials.

Anne M Stoddard1, Sarah A Fox, Mary E Costanza, Dorothy S Lane, M Robyn Andersen, Nicole Urban, Isaac Lipkus, Barbara K Rimer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women over age 50 continue to be underscreened for breast cancer. The purpose of this report is to compare the effectiveness of a barrier-specific telephone counseling intervention across the five study sites of the Breast Cancer Screening Consortium (BCSC).
METHODS: Each of the BCSC projects was a randomized study of the effectiveness of telephone counseling (TC) in comparison to a control condition. Eligible underusers were identified and surveyed by telephone before and after the implementation of the interventions. Data from a total of 3,461 underusers were analyzed. We tested whether significantly more women randomized to TC than to control were regular mammography users at the follow-up survey. Data were analyzed separately by site.
RESULTS: Overall, TC was not significantly more effective than control in encouraging regular mammography. The pooled consortium-wide odds ratio was 1.08 (95% confidence interval: 0.91 to 1.27).
CONCLUSIONS: TC has the potential to support maintenance of mammogram use. Modifications are needed to maximize this potential and additional methods should be used in conjunction with TC to reach women who are underusers of mammography. Copyright 2002 American Health Foundation and Elsevier Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11749101     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  13 in total

Review 1.  Telephone consultations.

Authors:  Josip Car; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-03

Review 2.  Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Deborah J del Junco
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population.

Authors:  Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Corey H Brouse; Celia Shmukler; Alfred Neugut; Lawrence T DeCarlo; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Telephone-based motivational interviewing for medication adherence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin S Teeter; Jan Kavookjian
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Improving rescreening in community clinics: does a system approach work?

Authors:  Regina Otero-Sabogal; Desi Owens; Jesse Canchola; Farzaneh Tabnak
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2006-12

6.  Staffing time required to increase cancer-screening rates through telephone support.

Authors:  Christina M Robinson; Michael L Beach; Mary Ann Greene; Andrea Cassells; Jonathan N Tobin; Allen J Dietrich
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2010 Apr-Jun

7.  A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change.

Authors:  Paul Krebs; James O Prochaska; Joseph S Rossi
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Sexual orientation and intentions to obtain breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Stacey L Hart; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Usual source of care in preventive service use: a regular doctor versus a regular site.

Authors:  K Tom Xu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Stephanie J Sohl; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.