Literature DB >> 11749084

The effects of prelimbic and infralimbic lesions on working memory for visual objects in rats.

Michael E Ragozzino1, Shauna Detrick, Raymond P Kesner.   

Abstract

The present experiment investigated the effects of quinolinic acid (90 mM) lesions of the prelimbic-infralimbic cortices on working memory for visual objects and on acquisition of a visual object discrimination. In both tests a GO/NO-GO procedure was used. In the working memory task, rats were tested before and after surgery. A continuous recognition procedure was used to assess working memory, which involved successive exposure to different three-dimensional objects that could be displaced to receive a cereal reinforcement. Of the 12 object presentations/session, 4 objects were presented for a second time in which displacing the object did not result in a reinforcement. The number of trials between the first and second presentations of an object ranged from 0 to 3 (lags). Memory was assessed by the latency to displace an object during the second presentation. In the visual object discrimination, rats had successive exposure to two different objects. Displacement of one object resulted in a cereal reinforcement, while displacement of the other did not. The findings indicated that prelimbic-infralimbic lesions significantly impaired memory for visual objects across all lags. Prelimbic-infralimbic lesions did not impair acquisition of the visual object discrimination. The results suggest that the prelimbic-infralimbic areas are part of neural system important in the short-term memory for visual objects. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11749084     DOI: 10.1006/nlme.2001.4003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  24 in total

1.  Persistent activity in a cortical-to-subcortical circuit: bridging the temporal gap in trace eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  Jennifer J Siegel; Brian Kalmbach; Raymond A Chitwood; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Midline thalamic reuniens lesions improve executive behaviors.

Authors:  J A Prasad; A R Abela; Y Chudasama
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Working memory deficits in retinoid X receptor gamma-deficient mice.

Authors:  Marta Wietrzych; Hamid Meziane; Anne Sutter; Norbert Ghyselinck; Paul F Chapman; Pierre Chambon; Wojciech Krezel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Recruitment of the prefrontal cortex and cerebellum in Parkinsonian rats following skilled aerobic exercise.

Authors:  Zhuo Wang; Yumei Guo; Kalisa G Myers; Ryan Heintz; Daniel P Holschneider
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 5.996

5.  Inactivation of the Prelimbic Cortex Attenuates Context-Dependent Operant Responding.

Authors:  Sydney Trask; Megan L Shipman; John T Green; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Anticipatory activity in rat medial prefrontal cortex during a working memory task.

Authors:  Wenwen Bai; Tiaotiao Liu; Hu Yi; Shuangyan Li; Xin Tian
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 5.203

7.  Long-lasting behavioral effects and recognition memory deficit induced by chronic mild stress in mice: effect of antidepressant treatment.

Authors:  N Elizalde; F J Gil-Bea; M J Ramírez; B Aisa; B Lasheras; J Del Rio; R M Tordera
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  The roles of the medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus in a spatial paired-association task.

Authors:  Inah Lee; Frances Solivan
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Dopamine depletion of the prefrontal cortex induces dendritic spine loss: reversal by atypical antipsychotic drug treatment.

Authors:  Hui-Dong Wang; Ariel Y Deutch
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 10.  Is there an inhibitory-response-control system in the rat? Evidence from anatomical and pharmacological studies of behavioral inhibition.

Authors:  Dawn M Eagle; Christelle Baunez
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.