Literature DB >> 11748703

Mass allometry of the appendicular skeleton in terrestrial mammals.

Per Christiansen1.   

Abstract

Most analyses on allometry of long bones in terrestrial mammals have focused on dimensional allometry, relating external bone measurements either to each other or to body mass. In this article, an analysis of long bone mass to body mass in 64 different species of mammals, spanning three orders of magnitude in body mass, is presented. As previously reported from analyses on total skeletal mass to body mass in terrestrial vertebrates, the masses of most appendicular bones scale with significant positive allometry. These include the pectoral and pelvic girdles, humerus, radius+ulna, and forelimb. Total hindlimb mass and the masses of individual hindlimb bones (femur, tibia, and metatarsus) scale isometrically. Metapodial mass correlates more poorly with body mass than the girdles or any of the long bones. Metapodial mass probably reflects locomotor behavior to a greater extent than do the long bones. Long bone mass in small mammals (<50 kg) scales with significantly greater positive allometry than bone mass in large (>50 kg) mammals, probably because of the proportionally shorter long bones of large mammals as a means of preserving resistance to bending forces at large body sizes. The positive allometric scaling of the skeleton in terrestrial animals has implications for the maximal size attainable, and it is possible that the largest sauropod dinosaurs approached this limit. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11748703     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  14 in total

1.  The relationship between bone mechanical properties and ground reaction forces in normal and hypermuscular mice.

Authors:  Daniel Schmitt; Ann C Zumwalt; Mark W Hamrick
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol       Date:  2010-07-01

2.  Scaling and mechanics of the felid calcaneus: geometric similarity without differential allometric scaling.

Authors:  Eloy Gálvez-López; Adrià Casinos
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Allometry of the Tendon Enthesis: Mechanisms of Load Transfer Between Tendon and Bone.

Authors:  Alix C Deymier-Black; Jill D Pasteris; Guy M Genin; Stavros Thomopoulos
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Scaling of adult human bone and skeletal muscle mass to height in the US population.

Authors:  Steven B Heymsfield; Phoenix Hwaung; Fernando Ferreyro-Bravo; Moonseong Heo; Diana M Thomas; John M Schuna
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 1.937

5.  Limb bone allometry during postnatal ontogeny in non-avian dinosaurs.

Authors:  Brandon M Kilbourne; Peter J Makovicky
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Broad-scale patterns of late jurassic dinosaur paleoecology.

Authors:  Christopher R Noto; Ari Grossman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  On the size and flight diversity of giant pterosaurs, the use of birds as pterosaur analogues and comments on pterosaur flightlessness.

Authors:  Mark P Witton; Michael B Habib
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Changes in shape and cross-sectional geometry in the tibia of mice selectively bred for increases in relative bone length.

Authors:  Miranda N Cosman; Leah M Sparrow; Campbell Rolian
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Of mice, men and elephants: the relation between articular cartilage thickness and body mass.

Authors:  Jos Malda; Janny C de Grauw; Kim E M Benders; Marja J L Kik; Chris H A van de Lest; Laura B Creemers; Wouter J A Dhert; P René van Weeren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Limb-bone scaling indicates diverse stance and gait in quadrupedal ornithischian dinosaurs.

Authors:  Susannah C R Maidment; Deborah H Linton; Paul Upchurch; Paul M Barrett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.