Literature DB >> 11748637

EGFR family expression in breast carcinomas. c-erbB-2 and c-erbB-4 receptors have different effects on survival.

Zhenhe Suo1, Bjørn Risberg, Mats G Kalsson, Kenneth Willman, Anne Tierens, Eva Skovlund, Jahn M Nesland.   

Abstract

One hundred patients with breast carcinoma followed for 7-11 years were included in the present study of EGFR family members, using immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR. By immunohistochemistry, 36%, 27%, 26%, and 82% of the tumours were positive for EGFR, c-erbB-2, c-erbB-3, and c-erbB-4. All the immunoreactive tumours were confirmed positive by RT-PCR. Tumour size, histological grade, lymph node status, S-phase fraction, and stage were confirmed to be significantly associated with both disease-free and cancer-specific survival in the present study. Methods of treatment, histological type, and ploidy had no significant effect on survival. Statistical analysis of EGFR family members in these tumours showed a significant association between c-erbB-2 expression and reduced disease-free and cancer-specific survival. c-erbB-4 expression was associated with a more favourable outcome. Co-expression of c-erbB-2 and EGFR was associated with a worse prognosis. c-erbB-4 expression, however, showed an antagonistic effect on the clinical influence of c-erbB-2 expression. In conclusion, c-erbB-2 expression in breast carcinomas is associated with an unfavourable clinical course and EGFR expression has a synergistic effect. However, c-erbB-4 antagonizes the c-erbB-2 effect on clinical course in breast carcinomas. To achieve best results with immunotherapy against the c-erbB-2 receptor, clarifying the status of c-erbB-4 expression may be of significance. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11748637     DOI: 10.1002/path.1003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  74 in total

1.  Phase I pharmacokinetic studies evaluating single and multiple doses of oral GW572016, a dual EGFR-ErbB2 inhibitor, in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Aimee K Bence; Eric B Anderson; Maqbool A Halepota; Michael A Doukas; Phillip A DeSimone; George A Davis; Deborah A Smith; Kevin M Koch; Andrew G Stead; Steve Mangum; Carolyn J Bowen; Neil L Spector; Showchien Hsieh; Val R Adams
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) to analyze the disruption of EGFR/HER2 dimers: a new method to evaluate the efficiency of targeted therapy using monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Nadège Gaborit; Christel Larbouret; Julie Vallaghe; Frédéric Peyrusson; Caroline Bascoul-Mollevi; Evelyne Crapez; David Azria; Thierry Chardès; Marie-Alix Poul; Gérard Mathis; Hervé Bazin; André Pèlegrin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The antibody sc-33040-R fails to specifically recognize phosphorylation of ErbB4 on tyrosine1056.

Authors:  Richard M Gallo; David J Riese
Journal:  Growth Factors       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.511

Review 4.  HER4 intracellular domain (4ICD) activity in the developing mammary gland and breast cancer.

Authors:  Frank E Jones
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.673

5.  Cooperative interactions of HER-2 and HPV-16 oncoproteins in the malignant transformation of human mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  Kathleen M Woods Ignatoski; Michele L Dziubinski; Cheryl Ammerman; Stephen P Ethier
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 6.  Role of ErbB4 in breast cancer.

Authors:  Maria Sundvall; Kristiina Iljin; Sami Kilpinen; Henri Sara; Olli-Pekka Kallioniemi; Klaus Elenius
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 7.  ERBB3/HER3 and ERBB2/HER2 duet in mammary development and breast cancer.

Authors:  David F Stern
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 2.673

8.  Prediction of outcome of patients with metastatic breast cancer: evaluation with prognostic factors and Nottingham prognostic index.

Authors:  Mu-Tai Liu; Wen-Tao Huang; Ai-Yih Wang; Chia-Chun Huang; Chao-Yuan Huang; Tung-Hao Chang; Chu-Pin Pi; Hao-Han Yang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Evaluation of the prognostic and predictive value of HER family mRNA expression in high-risk early breast cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study.

Authors:  A K Koutras; K T Kalogeras; M-A Dimopoulos; R M Wirtz; U Dafni; E Briasoulis; D Pectasides; H Gogas; C Christodoulou; G Aravantinos; G Zografos; E Timotheadou; P Papakostas; H Linardou; E Razis; T Economopoulos; H P Kalofonos; G Fountzilas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Presence of HER4 associates with increased sensitivity to Herceptin in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Sassen; Simone Diermeier-Daucher; Manuela Sieben; Olaf Ortmann; Ferdinand Hofstaedter; Stephan Schwarz; Gero Brockhoff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.