Literature DB >> 11748306

Distinct phenotypes distinguish the molecular classes of Angelman syndrome.

A C Lossie1, M M Whitney, D Amidon, H J Dong, P Chen, D Theriaque, A Hutson, R D Nicholls, R T Zori, C A Williams, D J Driscoll.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Angelman syndrome (AS) is a severe neurobehavioural disorder caused by defects in the maternally derived imprinted domain located on 15q11-q13. Most patients acquire AS by one of five mechanisms: (1) a large interstitial deletion of 15q11-q13; (2) paternal uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 15; (3) an imprinting defect (ID); (4) a mutation in the E3 ubiquitin protein ligase gene (UBE3A); or (5) unidentified mechanism(s). All classical patients from these classes exhibit four cardinal features, including severe developmental delay and/or mental retardation, profound speech impairment, a movement and balance disorder, and AS specific behaviour typified by an easily excitable personality with an inappropriately happy affect. In addition, patients can display other characteristics, including microcephaly, hypopigmentation, and seizures.
METHODS: We restricted the present study to 104 patients (93 families) with a classical AS phenotype. All of our patients were evaluated for 22 clinical variables including growth parameters, acquisition of motor skills, and history of seizures. In addition, molecular and cytogenetic analyses were used to assign a molecular class (I-V) to each patient for genotype-phenotype correlations.
RESULTS: In our patient repository, 22% of our families had normal DNA methylation analyses along 15q11-q13. Of these, 44% of sporadic patients had mutations within UBE3A, the largest percentage found to date. Our data indicate that the five molecular classes can be divided into four phenotypic groups: deletions, UPD and ID patients, UBE3A mutation patients, and subjects with unknown aetiology. Deletion patients are the most severely affected, while UPD and ID patients are the least. Differences in body mass index, head circumference, and seizure activity are the most pronounced among the classes.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinically, we were unable to distinguish between UPD and ID patients, suggesting that 15q11-q13 contains the only significant maternally expressed imprinted genes on chromosome 15.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11748306      PMCID: PMC1734773          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.38.12.834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  84 in total

1.  A further Angelman syndrome patient with UPD15 due to paternal meiosis II nondisjunction.

Authors:  C Fridman; M Santos; I Ferrari; C P Koiffmann
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  Atypical features in Angelman syndrome due to imprinting defect of uniparental disomy of chromosome 15.

Authors:  B Dan; S G Boyd; F Christiaens; W Courtens; L Van Maldergem; A Kahn
Journal:  Neuropediatrics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.947

3.  MECP2 mutation in non-fatal, non-progressive encephalopathy in a male.

Authors:  B Imessaoudene; J P Bonnefont; G Royer; V Cormier-Daire; S Lyonnet; G Lyon; A Munnich; J Amiel
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Large-scale evaluation of imprinting status in the Prader-Willi syndrome region: an imprinted direct repeat cluster resembling small nucleolar RNA genes.

Authors:  M Meguro; K Mitsuya; N Nomura; M Kohda; A Kashiwagi; R Nishigaki; H Yoshioka; M Nakao; M Oishi; M Oshimura
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Novel mutations of ubiquitin protein ligase 3A gene in Italian patients with Angelman syndrome.

Authors:  S Russo; F Cogliati; M Viri; F Cavalleri; A Selicorni; L Turolla; S Belli; A Romeo; L Larizza
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  A novel ATPase on mouse chromosome 7 is a candidate gene for increased body fat.

Authors:  M Dhar; L S Webb; L Smith; L Hauser; D Johnson; D B West
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2000-11-09       Impact factor: 3.107

7.  Paternal UPD15: further genetic and clinical studies in four Angelman syndrome patients.

Authors:  C Fridman; M C Varela; F Kok; A Diament; C P Koiffmann
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000-06-19

8.  Human papillomavirus type 16 E6 induces self-ubiquitination of the E6AP ubiquitin-protein ligase.

Authors:  W H Kao; S L Beaudenon; A L Talis; J M Huibregtse; P M Howley
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Angelman syndrome phenotype associated with mutations in MECP2, a gene encoding a methyl CpG binding protein.

Authors:  P Watson; G Black; S Ramsden; M Barrow; M Super; B Kerr; J Clayton-Smith
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  Transmission of Angelman syndrome by an affected mother.

Authors:  A C Lossie; D J Driscoll
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  98 in total

1.  Tissue-specific variation of Ube3a protein expression in rodents and in a mouse model of Angelman syndrome.

Authors:  Richard M Gustin; Terry Jo Bichell; Michael Bubser; Jennifer Daily; Irina Filonova; Davit Mrelashvili; Ariel Y Deutch; Roger J Colbran; Edwin J Weeber; Kevin F Haas
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 5.996

2.  A neurodevelopmental survey of Angelman syndrome with genotype-phenotype correlations.

Authors:  Jennifer K Gentile; Wen-Hann Tan; Lucia T Horowitz; Carlos A Bacino; Steven A Skinner; Rene Barbieri-Welge; Astrid Bauer-Carlin; Arthur L Beaudet; Terry Jo Bichell; Hye-Seung Lee; Trilochan Sahoo; Susan E Waisbren; Lynne M Bird; Sarika U Peters
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.225

3.  Neuroepigenomics: Resources, Obstacles, and Opportunities.

Authors:  John S Satterlee; Andrea Beckel-Mitchener; Roger Little; Dena Procaccini; Joni L Rutter; Amy C Lossie
Journal:  Neuroepigenetics       Date:  2015-01-01

4.  A therapeutic trial of pro-methylation dietary supplements in Angelman syndrome.

Authors:  Lynne M Bird; Wen-Hann Tan; Carlos A Bacino; Sarika U Peters; Steven A Skinner; Irina Anselm; Rene Barbieri-Welge; Astrid Bauer-Carlin; Jennifer K Gentile; Daniel G Glaze; Lucia T Horowitz; K Naga Mohan; Mark P Nespeca; Trilochan Sahoo; Dean Sarco; Susan E Waisbren; Arthur L Beaudet
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Microarray analysis of gene/transcript expression in Angelman syndrome: deletion versus UPD.

Authors:  Douglas C Bittel; Nataliya Kibiryeva; Zohreh Talebizadeh; Daniel J Driscoll; Merlin G Butler
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.736

6.  Induced pluripotent stem cell models of the genomic imprinting disorders Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes.

Authors:  Stormy J Chamberlain; Pin-Fang Chen; Khong Y Ng; Fany Bourgois-Rocha; Fouad Lemtiri-Chlieh; Eric S Levine; Marc Lalande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Angelman syndrome (AS, MIM 105830).

Authors:  Griet Van Buggenhout; Jean-Pierre Fryns
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the SNRPN gene using real-time PCR with melting curve analysis.

Authors:  Chia-Cheng Hung; Shin-Yu Lin; Shuan-Pei Lin; Chih-Ping Chen; Lang-Yao Chen; Chien-Nan Lee; Yi-Ning Su
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.568

9.  Influence of the Prader-Willi syndrome imprinting center on the DNA methylation landscape in the mouse brain.

Authors:  Jason O Brant; Alberto Riva; James L Resnick; Thomas P Yang
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.528

10.  E6AP in the brain: one protein, dual function, multiple diseases.

Authors:  Jimmy El Hokayem; Zafar Nawaz
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 5.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.