Literature DB >> 11746334

Country estimates of maternal mortality: an alternative model.

R Hakkert1.   

Abstract

Ever since the publication of country level estimates of maternal mortality for 1990 by WHO and UNICEF, there has been some degree of controversy about these estimates. The recent publication of a 1995 revision, based on the modification of the multivariate model used for 1990, has not managed to put this controversy to rest. Countries with national estimates of their own have generally protested against the higher figures resulting from the multivariate modelling approach used by WHO and UNICEF, but some experts have also objected to the model itself. As a result of earlier discussions with the WHO/UNICEF team, some adjustments were incorporated into their model, notably the age standardization of maternal mortality ratios (MMRs) and proportions maternal among deaths of females of reproductive age (PMDF) of demographic and health surveys (DHS) direct sisterhood data, as the use of unstandardized values was shown to cause systematic biases. However, a model feature that continued to be controversial was the use of the PMDF as the dependent variable. As will be shown in this paper, the use of this dependent variable has a number of conceptual and practical disadvantages, such as its dependence on non-maternal deaths and the need for separate projections of births and deaths of women of reproductive age, in order to convert the estimated PMDF into a more conventional MMR. The latter greatly increases the uncertainty of the resulting MMR estimates, even though this additional variance is ignored in the WHO/UNICEF estimates of confidence intervals. On balance, the MMR, while also subject to some legitimate objections, is still considered preferable as an independent variable. This paper therefore derives alternative country estimates for 1995 based on a multivariate model of the MMR. The model is shown to lead to smaller root mean square relative errors of the MMR estimates. While the overall number of maternal deaths estimated worldwide is very similar to the number reached by WHO/UNICEF, there are major disagreements with respect to particular countries. Finally, a discussion is included on the appropriate way to incorporate the DHS direct sisterhood data, as this affects the results substantially. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11746334     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  7 in total

1.  A New Method for Deriving Global Estimates of Maternal Mortality.

Authors:  John R Wilmoth; Nobuko Mizoguchi; Mikkel Z Oestergaard; Lale Say; Colin D Mathers; Sarah Zureick-Brown; Mie Inoue; Doris Chou
Journal:  Stat Politics Policy       Date:  2012-07-13

2.  Community Study of maternal mortality in South West Nigeria: how applicable is the sisterhood method.

Authors:  Adetoro A Adegoke; Malcolm Campbell; Martins O Ogundeji; Taiwo O Lawoyin; Ann M Thomson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-02

Review 3.  National estimates for maternal mortality: an analysis based on the WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity.

Authors:  Ana P Betrán; Daniel Wojdyla; Samuel F Posner; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Maternal mortality in Malawi, 1977-2012.

Authors:  Tim Colbourn; Sonia Lewycka; Bejoy Nambiar; Iqbal Anwar; Ann Phoya; Chisale Mhango
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The unmet need for emergency obstetric care in Tanga Region, Tanzania.

Authors:  Helen Prytherch; Siriel Massawe; Rainer Kuelker; Claudia Hunger; Ferdinand Mtatifikolo; Albrecht Jahn
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges.

Authors:  A Metin Gülmezoglu; Lale Say; Ana P Betrán; Jose Villar; Gilda Piaggio
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Application of Capture-Recapture for Fine-tuning Uncertainties About National Maternal Mortality Estimates.

Authors:  Bahareh Yazdizadeh; Kazem Mohammad; Saharnaz Nedjat; Nasrin Changizi; Arash Azemikhah; Nahid Jafari; Laleh Radpoyan; Reza Majdzadeh
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.