Literature DB >> 11746328

Correcting for measurement error in binary and continuous variables using replicates.

I White1, C Frost, S Tokunaga.   

Abstract

Measurement error in exposures and confounders leads to bias in regression coefficients. It is possible to adjust for this bias if true values or independent replicates are observed on a subsample. We extend a method suitable for quantitative variables to the situation where both binary and quantitative variables are present. Binary variables with independent replicates introduce two extra problems: (i) the error is correlated with the true value, and (ii) the measurement error probabilities are unidentified if only two replicates are available. We show that - under plausible assumptions - adjustment for error in binary confounders does not need to address these problems. The regression coefficient for a binary exposure is overadjusted if methods for continuous variables are used. Correct adjustment is possible either if three replicates are available, or if further assumptions can be made; otherwise, bounds can be put on the correctly adjusted value, and these bounds are reasonably close together if the exposure has prevalence near 0.5. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11746328     DOI: 10.1002/sim.908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  Probabilistic techniques for obtaining accurate patient counts in Clinical Data Warehouses.

Authors:  Risa B Myers; Jorge R Herskovic
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Using Electronic Health Record Data to Study Latino Immigrant Populations in Health Services Research.

Authors:  John Heintzman; Miguel Marino; Khaya Clark; Stuart Cowburn; Sonia Sosa; Lizdaly Cancel; David Ezekiel-Herrera; Deborah Cohen
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2020-08

3.  STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 2-More complex methods of adjustment and advanced topics.

Authors:  Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Ruth H Keogh; Victor Kipnis; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Helmut Küchenhoff; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 1-Basic theory and simple methods of adjustment.

Authors:  Ruth H Keogh; Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Helmut Küchenhoff; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Victor Kipnis; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Correcting for multivariate measurement error by regression calibration in meta-analyses of epidemiological studies.

Authors: 
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Reproducibility measures and their effect on diet-cancer associations in the Boyd Orr cohort.

Authors:  Clare Frobisher; Kate Tilling; Pauline M Emmett; Maria Maynard; Andrew R Ness; George Davey Smith; Stephen J Frankel; David J Gunnell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Is there a causal effect of parity on body composition: a birth cohort study.

Authors:  Bárbara Reis-Santos; Fernando C Barros; Bernardo L Horta
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Short-Term Repeatability of Insulin Resistance Indexes in Older Adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  Anna K Poon; Michelle L Meyer; Gerald Reaven; Joshua W Knowles; Elizabeth Selvin; James S Pankow; David Couper; Laura Loehr; Gerardo Heiss
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Demonstrating the robustness of population surveillance data: implications of error rates on demographic and mortality estimates.

Authors:  Edward Fottrell; Peter Byass; Yemane Berhane
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Tuberculosis in Brazil and cash transfer programs: A longitudinal database study of the effect of cash transfer on cure rates.

Authors:  Barbara Reis-Santos; Priya Shete; Adelmo Bertolde; Carolina M Sales; Mauro N Sanchez; Denise Arakaki-Sanchez; Kleydson B Andrade; M Gabriela M Gomes; Delia Boccia; Christian Lienhardt; Ethel L Maciel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.