BACKGROUND: Little is understood regarding mechanisms of perineural invasion in prostate cancer progression. We present a novel model system and data that indicate perineural invasion is an active, specific, and reciprocal interaction between nerves and prostate cancer cells. METHODS: Mouse dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and human prostate cancer cells (Du-145, LNCaP, PC3) and stromal cells (HTS-40F) were co-cultured in Matrigel matrix. Control cultures consisted of prostate cancer and stromal cells only and DRG only. Neurite outgrowth, cell colony growth, neurite-colony contact, and retrograde extension were quantitated with dark phase microscopy and image analysis (Optimas 6.1). RESULTS: Directional outgrowth of neurites was observed projecting into DU-145 colonies within 24 hr of co-culture. Cultures with the greatest number of DU-145 cells recruited significantly more neurites and established contact earlier, indicating this process was cell-seeding density dependent. Once neurite/DU-145 cell contact was established neurite growth diminished, suggesting an active neurite recruitment by DU-145 cells. Subsequent to neurite contact, DU-145 cells migrated along neurites in a retrograde fashion into the nerve/ganglion of origin (retrograde extension) establishing perineural invasion. In addition to perineural invasion, DU-145 colony growth was elevated in DRG co-cultures relative to DU-145-only control cell cultures. Similarly, the degree of neurite outgrowth was elevated in DRG-cell co-cultures relative to DRG-only control cultures. The same observations were made with LNCaP and PC3 cells, but interactions between stromal cells and nerves were not found. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the utility of the prostate cancer/DRG in vitro system to study specific mechanism of prostate cancer cell-nerve interaction. Moreover, these data suggest that perineural invasion mechanisms involve active and reciprocal interactions between carcinoma cells and adjacent nerve/ganglions in prostate cancer progression. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Little is understood regarding mechanisms of perineural invasion in prostate cancer progression. We present a novel model system and data that indicate perineural invasion is an active, specific, and reciprocal interaction between nerves and prostate cancer cells. METHODS:Mouse dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and humanprostate cancer cells (Du-145, LNCaP, PC3) and stromal cells (HTS-40F) were co-cultured in Matrigel matrix. Control cultures consisted of prostate cancer and stromal cells only and DRG only. Neurite outgrowth, cell colony growth, neurite-colony contact, and retrograde extension were quantitated with dark phase microscopy and image analysis (Optimas 6.1). RESULTS: Directional outgrowth of neurites was observed projecting into DU-145 colonies within 24 hr of co-culture. Cultures with the greatest number of DU-145 cells recruited significantly more neurites and established contact earlier, indicating this process was cell-seeding density dependent. Once neurite/DU-145 cell contact was established neurite growth diminished, suggesting an active neurite recruitment by DU-145 cells. Subsequent to neurite contact, DU-145 cells migrated along neurites in a retrograde fashion into the nerve/ganglion of origin (retrograde extension) establishing perineural invasion. In addition to perineural invasion, DU-145 colony growth was elevated in DRG co-cultures relative to DU-145-only control cell cultures. Similarly, the degree of neurite outgrowth was elevated in DRG-cell co-cultures relative to DRG-only control cultures. The same observations were made with LNCaP and PC3 cells, but interactions between stromal cells and nerves were not found. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the utility of the prostate cancer/DRG in vitro system to study specific mechanism of prostate cancer cell-nerve interaction. Moreover, these data suggest that perineural invasion mechanisms involve active and reciprocal interactions between carcinoma cells and adjacent nerve/ganglions in prostate cancer progression. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Sylvie Deborde; Yasong Yu; Andrea Marcadis; Chun-Hao Chen; Ning Fan; Richard L Bakst; Richard J Wong Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Shuangba He; Chun-Hao Chen; Natalya Chernichenko; Shizhi He; Richard L Bakst; Fernando Barajas; Sylvie Deborde; Peter J Allen; Efsevia Vakiani; Zhenkun Yu; Richard J Wong Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yi Ding; Dandan He; Diego Florentin; Anna Frolov; Sue Hilsenbeck; Michael Ittmann; Dov Kadmon; Brian Miles; David Rowley; Gustavo Ayala Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Robyn L Prueitt; Ming Yi; Robert S Hudson; Tiffany A Wallace; Tiffany M Howe; Harris G Yfantis; Dong H Lee; Robert M Stephens; Chang-Gong Liu; George A Calin; Carlo M Croce; Stefan Ambs Journal: Prostate Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Olivier De Wever; Lara Derycke; An Hendrix; Gert De Meerleer; François Godeau; Herman Depypere; Marc Bracke Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2007-10-19 Impact factor: 5.150