Literature DB >> 11746169

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), a collaborative activity of clinical genetic departments and IVF centres.

J P Geraedts1, J Harper, P Braude, K Sermon, A Veiga, L Gianaroli, N Agan, S Munné, S Gitlin, E Blenow, K de Boer, N Hussey, J Traeger-Synodinos, S H Lee, S Viville, L Krey, P Ray, S Emiliani, Y H Liu, S Vermeulen, E Kanavakis.   

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) requires the combined efforts of geneticists and workers in the field of reproductive medicine. This was studied on the basis of a questionnaire, sent to 35 members of the PGD Consortium of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). A reply was obtained from 20 centres. They represent the majority of activities in the field of PGD in the world. It is obvious that many of the activities (in vitro fertilisation, embryo culture and biopsy) take place in IVF units while others (counselling and diagnosis) are the responsibility of genetic diagnostic centres. The distances between both units vary considerably. In all but one centre sex determination is offered. Aneuploidy screening is offered in 13 out of 20 centres. PGD of translocations and other structural chromosome abnormalities is offered in all but one centre. The number of monogenic diseases offered varies considerably. In comparison to prenatal diagnosis PGD is more expensive. The majority of these costs are due to the IVF or ICSI procedure. The charges for PGD vary between about 600 euro and 4000 euro. In 16 out of 20 centres the parents to be must sign an informed consent form. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11746169     DOI: 10.1002/pd.249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  4 in total

1.  Public Perceptions of Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) in Malaysia.

Authors:  Angelina P Olesen; Siti Nurani Mohd Nor; Latifah Amin; Anisah Che Ngah
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Clinical genetics in transition-a comparison of genetic services in Estonia, Finland, and the Netherlands.

Authors:  T Vrijenhoek; N Tonisson; H Kääriäinen; L Leitsalu; T Rigter
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-03-11

3.  Perinatal follow-up of children born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis between 1995 and 2014.

Authors:  Malou Heijligers; Aafke van Montfoort; Madelon Meijer-Hoogeveen; Frank Broekmans; Katelijne Bouman; Irene Homminga; Jos Dreesen; Aimee Paulussen; John Engelen; Edith Coonen; Vyne van der Schoot; Marieke van Deursen-Luijten; Nienke Muntjewerff; Andrea Peeters; Ron van Golde; Mark van der Hoeven; Yvonne Arens; Christine de Die-Smulders
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Should we transfer poor quality embryos?

Authors:  Anastasia Kirillova; Sergey Lysenkov; Maria Farmakovskaya; Yulia Kiseleva; Bella Martazanova; Nona Mishieva; Aydar Abubakirov; Gennady Sukhikh
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2020-02-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.