Literature DB >> 11746081

Clinical trials in the 21st century: the case for participant-centered research.

D Gross1, L Fogg.   

Abstract

Informed consumers of the 21st century increasingly will be hesitant to enroll in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) because they will be unwilling to (a) submit to random assignment; (b) complete assessments that are too lengthy, intrusive, or irrelevant; or (c) comply with protocols that do not meet their needs. Research centered on the needs and interests of participants is likely to engender greater participation and commitment than are traditional RCTs. Recommendations for making clinical trials more participant centered include: (a) expanding our conceptualizations of study validity, (b) involving consumers as advisers in the development and execution of clinical trials, and (c) offering participants reasonable alternatives to random assignment. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11746081     DOI: 10.1002/nur.10010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  23 in total

1.  An alternative view on "an alternative paradigm".

Authors:  Sandra Ward; Heidi Scharf Donovan; Ronald C Serlin
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  AASAP: a program to increase recruitment and retention in clinical trials.

Authors:  Lawrence Fisher; Danielle Hessler; Diana Naranjo; William Polonsky
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-08-09

3.  Integrating Decision Making and Mental Health Interventions Research: Research Directions.

Authors:  Celia E Wills; Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  Clin Psychol (New York)       Date:  2006

4.  Comparability work and the management of difference in research synthesis studies.

Authors:  Margarete Sandelowski; Corrine I Voils; Julie Barroso
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  To attend, or not to attend: Examining caregiver intentions and study compliance in a pediatric, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Sullivan; Anna M Wiese; Kelly M Boone; Joseph Rausch; Sarah A Keim
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  How to optimize participant retention and complete follow-up in surgical research.

Authors:  Manrajr Kaur; Sheila Sprague; Teegan Ignacy; Achilles Thoma; Mohit Bhandari; Forough Farrokhyar
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Evaluating parents' perspectives of pediatric ethics consultation.

Authors:  Frances Rieth Ward
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2013-06

8.  Improving recruitment to clinical trials during pregnancy: A mixed methods investigation.

Authors:  Sofia Strömmer; Wendy Lawrence; Taylor Rose; Christina Vogel; Daniella Watson; Joanne N Bottell; Janice Parmenter; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Hazel Inskip; Janis Baird; Mary Barker
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Ethical dilemmas and ethical competence in the daily work of research nurses.

Authors:  A T Höglund; G Helgesson; S Eriksson
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2009-09-25

Review 10.  Strategies to recruit minority persons: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Ibrahim; Souraya Sidani
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.