Literature DB >> 11745830

Sex differences in the prevalence of human birth defects: a population-based study.

J M Lary1, L J Paulozzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in the prevalence of several human birth defects have often been reported in the literature, but the extent of sex differences for most birth defects is unknown. To determine the full extent of sex differences in birth defects in a population, we examined population-based data from the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP).
METHODS: MACDP records were analyzed for 1968 through 1995. We determined the sex-specific prevalence of all major birth defects, using the total number of live births by sex during these years as the denominator. For each specific defect, we calculated a relative risk with regard to sex on the basis of the ratio of prevalence among males to prevalence among females. Male-female relative risks were also determined for total major birth defects and for several broad categories of defects.
RESULTS: The overall prevalence of major defects at birth was 3.9% among males and 2.8% among females. All but two of the major categories of birth defects (nervous system defects and endocrine system defects) had a higher prevalence among males. Defects of the sex organs were eight and one-half times more prevalent among males and accounted for about half of the increased risk of birth defects among males relative to females. Urinary tract defects were 62% more prevalent among males, and gastrointestinal tract defects were 55% more prevalent among males. Among specific defect types, twofold or greater differences in prevalence by sex were common.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that sex differences in the prevalence of specific human birth defects are common, and male infants are at greater risk for birth defects than female infants. Several mechanisms have been proposed to account for these differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11745830     DOI: 10.1002/tera.1070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teratology        ISSN: 0040-3709


  27 in total

Review 1.  An ounce of prevention: a pound of cure for an ailing health care system.

Authors:  Stephen J Genuis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Getting to the heart of the matter: epidemiology of cyanotic heart defects.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kornosky; Hamisu M Salihu
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Identification of novel candidate gene loci and increased sex chromosome aneuploidy among infants with conotruncal heart defects.

Authors:  Kazutoyo Osoegawa; David M Iovannisci; Bin Lin; Christina Parodi; Kathleen Schultz; Gary M Shaw; Edward J Lammer
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Fetal Pathology of Neural Tube Defects - An Overview of 68 Cases.

Authors:  Katharina Schoner; Roland Axt-Fliedner; Rainer Bald; Barbara Fritz; Juergen Kohlhase; Thomas Kohl; Helga Rehder
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  Congenital anomalies among live births in a polluted area. A ten-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Emilio Antonio Luca Gianicolo; Antonella Bruni; Enrico Rosati; Saverio Sabina; Roberto Guarino; Gabriella Padolecchia; Carlo Leo; Maria Angela Vigotti; Maria Grazia Andreassi; Giuseppe Latini
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  A description of congenital anomalies among infants in Entebbe, Uganda.

Authors:  Juliet Ndibazza; Swaib Lule; Margaret Nampijja; Harriet Mpairwe; Gloria Oduru; Molly Kiggundu; Miriam Akello; Lawrence Muhangi; Alison M Elliott
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2011-07-18

7.  Turner syndrome and the evolution of human sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Bernard Crespi
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Bloomsbury report on mouse embryo phenotyping: recommendations from the IMPC workshop on embryonic lethal screening.

Authors:  David Adams; Richard Baldock; Shoumo Bhattacharya; Andrew J Copp; Mary Dickinson; Nicholas D E Greene; Mark Henkelman; Monica Justice; Timothy Mohun; Stephen A Murray; Erwin Pauws; Michael Raess; Janet Rossant; Tom Weaver; David West
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 5.758

9.  Birth defects, season of conception, and sex of children born to pesticide applicators living in the Red River Valley of Minnesota, USA.

Authors:  Vincent F Garry; Mary E Harkins; Leanna L Erickson; Leslie K Long-Simpson; Seth E Holland; Barbara L Burroughs
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Do parents of children with congenital malformations have a higher cancer risk? A nationwide study in Denmark.

Authors:  J L Zhu; O Basso; H Hasle; J F Winther; J H Olsen; J Olsen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-08-27       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.